Bruno Patris

1.0k total citations
30 papers, 733 citations indexed

About

Bruno Patris is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Social Psychology and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Bruno Patris has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 733 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sensory Systems, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 10 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Bruno Patris's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (17 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (12 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (9 papers). Bruno Patris is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (17 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (12 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (9 papers). Bruno Patris collaborates with scholars based in France, Spain and Israel. Bruno Patris's co-authors include C. Baudoin, Dominique Valentin, Benoı̂st Schaal, Jordi Ballester, Ronan Symoneaux, Frank Cézilly, M Préault, Bruno Faivre, Syrina Al Aïn and Patrick Gouat and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Animal Behaviour and Behavioural Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Bruno Patris

25 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bruno Patris France 14 241 217 213 170 169 30 733
Klaudia Modlińska Poland 15 96 0.4× 51 0.2× 304 1.4× 70 0.4× 198 1.2× 40 730
Véronique Deiss France 20 60 0.2× 78 0.4× 87 0.4× 93 0.5× 78 0.5× 37 1.1k
Gérard Coureaud France 23 109 0.5× 1.2k 5.6× 406 1.9× 136 0.8× 92 0.5× 68 1.8k
M. C. Meunier‐Salaün France 24 137 0.6× 42 0.2× 177 0.8× 70 0.4× 323 1.9× 54 2.4k
Omer Nevo Germany 16 406 1.7× 121 0.6× 144 0.7× 31 0.2× 108 0.6× 34 698
Laura Teresa Hernández Salazar Mexico 17 174 0.7× 442 2.0× 244 1.1× 24 0.1× 78 0.5× 54 774
Sébastien Romagny France 7 88 0.4× 162 0.7× 39 0.2× 89 0.5× 17 0.1× 14 364
J.E. Bolhuis Netherlands 27 118 0.5× 51 0.2× 316 1.5× 54 0.3× 130 0.8× 54 1.6k
T.S. Brand South Africa 23 111 0.5× 35 0.2× 284 1.3× 72 0.4× 116 0.7× 144 1.6k
Vilmos Altbäcker Hungary 19 268 1.1× 89 0.4× 199 0.9× 14 0.1× 338 2.0× 58 971

Countries citing papers authored by Bruno Patris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bruno Patris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruno Patris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruno Patris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bruno Patris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruno Patris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruno Patris. The network helps show where Bruno Patris may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruno Patris

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruno Patris. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruno Patris based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bruno Patris. Bruno Patris is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Damon, Fabrice, et al.. (2025). Olfactory awareness in lambs assessed through habituation-dishabituation and approach-withdrawal tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 291. 106734–106734.
2.
Patris, Bruno, et al.. (2024). Do lambs differentiate the odor of their mother from that of an alien ewe? Focus on inguinal wax. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 283. 106496–106496.
3.
Damon, Fabrice, et al.. (2024). Do sheep (Ovis aries) discriminate human emotional odors?. Animal Cognition. 27(1). 51–51. 1 indexed citations
4.
Soussignan, Robert, Karine Durand, Fabrice Damon, et al.. (2024). Testing detectability, attractivity, hedonic specificity, extractability, and robustness of colostrum odor—Toward an olfactory bioassay for human neonates. Developmental Psychobiology. 66(3). e22474–e22474.
5.
Schaal, Benoı̂st, et al.. (2022). Mother’s scent for motherless neonates: Responses of artificially reared lambs to ewe’s inguinal wax odor. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 258. 105812–105812. 3 indexed citations
6.
Destrez, Alexandra, et al.. (2021). Male mice and cows perceive human emotional chemosignals: a preliminary study. Animal Cognition. 24(6). 1205–1214. 13 indexed citations
7.
Durand, Karine, Fabrice Damon, Bruno Patris, et al.. (2020). Human neonates prefer colostrum to mature milk: Evidence for an olfactory bias toward the “initial milk”?. American Journal of Human Biology. 33(5). e23521–e23521. 9 indexed citations
8.
Patris, Bruno, et al.. (2019). Attractive and appetitive odor factors in murine milk: Their fade-out time and differential cryo-preservation. Behavioural Processes. 167. 103913–103913.
9.
Aïn, Syrina Al, et al.. (2015). Newborns prefer the odor of milk and nipples from females matched in lactation age: Comparison of two mouse strains. Physiology & Behavior. 147. 122–130. 5 indexed citations
10.
Aïn, Syrina Al, et al.. (2014). The response of newly born mice to odors of murine colostrum and milk: Unconditionally attractive, conditionally discriminated. Developmental Psychobiology. 56(6). 1365–1376. 10 indexed citations
11.
Schaal, Benoı̂st, Syrina Al Aïn, & Bruno Patris. (2013). Testing Smell When It Is Really Vital: Behavioral Assays of Social Odors in the Neonatal Mouse. Methods in molecular biology. 1068. 349–371. 3 indexed citations
12.
Aïn, Syrina Al, et al.. (2012). How does a newly born mouse get to the nipple? odor substrates eliciting first nipple grasping and sucking responses. Developmental Psychobiology. 55(8). 888–901. 28 indexed citations
13.
Aïn, Syrina Al, et al.. (2012). An Odor Timer in Milk? Synchrony in the Odor of Milk Effluvium and Neonatal Chemosensation in the Mouse. PLoS ONE. 7(10). e47228–e47228. 9 indexed citations
14.
Aïn, Syrina Al, et al.. (2011). Orientation of newborn mice to lactating females: Identifying biological substrates of semiochemical interest. Developmental Psychobiology. 55(2). 113–124. 11 indexed citations
15.
Soussignan, Robert, et al.. (2010). Long‐lasting memory for an odor acquired at the mother's breast. Developmental Science. 13(6). 849–863. 51 indexed citations
16.
Schaal, Benoı̂st, et al.. (2009). Mammary olfactory signalisation in females and odor processing in neonates: Ways evolved by rabbits and humans. Behavioural Brain Research. 200(2). 346–358. 47 indexed citations
17.
Valentin, Dominique, et al.. (2007). Expertise and memory for beers and beer olfactory compounds. Food Quality and Preference. 18(5). 776–785. 35 indexed citations
18.
Baudoin, Claude, Nicolas Busquet, F. Stephen Dobson, et al.. (2005). Male-female associations and female olfactory neurogenesis with pair bonding in Mus spicilegus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 84(3). 323–334. 35 indexed citations
19.
Patris, Bruno & C. Baudoin. (2000). A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implications for the mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Behavioural Processes. 51(1-3). 35–43. 59 indexed citations
20.
Gouat, Patrick, et al.. (1998). Conspecific and heterospecific behavioural discrimination of individual odours by mound-building mice. Comptes Rendus de l Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie. 321(7). 571–575. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026