This map shows the geographic impact of T.S. Brand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.S. Brand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.S. Brand more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.S. Brand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.S. Brand. The network helps show where T.S. Brand may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T.S. Brand
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T.S. Brand.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T.S. Brand based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T.S. Brand. T.S. Brand is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (2012). Preliminary results on the description of body composition change in ostriches (Struthio camelus) under optimal feeding conditions. South African Journal of Animal Science. 40(5). 429–433.1 indexed citations
Brand, T.S., et al.. (2010). The response in food intake and reproductive parameters of breeding ostriches to increasing dietary energy. South African Journal of Animal Science. 40(5). 434–437.8 indexed citations
6.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (2010). Effect of two levels of supplementary feeding and two stocking rates of grazing ostriches on irrigated lucerne dry matter intake and production. South African Journal of Animal Science. 40(5). 424–428.1 indexed citations
7.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (2008). The carry-over effect of supplementation in the previous year on the production of South African Mutton Merino ewes. 5(2). 10–12.1 indexed citations
8.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (2008). Rumen inert fat or starch as supplementary energy sources for reproducing ewes grazing wheat stubble. 5(3). 9–12.1 indexed citations
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1994). Comparison of triticale cultivars with maize grain for finishing lambs. South African Journal of Animal Science. 24(4). 143–146.2 indexed citations
15.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1992). Substitution of lucerne hay by untreated, urea-enriched and urea-ammoniated wheat straw in diets for sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science. 22(6). 185–193.3 indexed citations
16.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1992). An evaluation of fababean ( Vicia faba ) and lupin ( Lupinus albus ) stubble and seed for sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science. 22(5). 170–174.6 indexed citations
17.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1991). Wheat-straw as roughage component in finishing diets of growing lambs. South African Journal of Animal Science. 21(4). 184–188.5 indexed citations
18.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1990). The use of pigs both intact and with ileo-rectal anastomosis to estimate the apparent and true digestibility of amino acids in untreated, heat-treated and thermal-ammoniated high-tannin grain sorghum. South African Journal of Animal Science. 20(4). 223–228.6 indexed citations
19.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1989). Effect of thermal ammoniation and heat treatment of high-tannin grain sorghum on the TME value for roosters and relative nutritive value for rats. South African Journal of Animal Science. 19(3). 125–129.4 indexed citations
20.
Brand, T.S., et al.. (1989). Use of the mobile nylon bag technique to determine digestible energy in pig diets. South African Journal of Animal Science. 19(4). 165–170.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.