Bridget Blodgett

677 citations
15 papers · 331 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Social Media and Politics 4
    • Media Studies and Communication 2
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media 7
    • Media, Gender, and Advertising 4

Bridget Blodgett

14 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Bridget Blodgett
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Gender Studies 177
  • Communication 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 255
  • Human-Computer Interaction 21
  • Industrial relations 2
Replace Amanda C. Coté with:
Amanda C. Coté United States
Liam Bullingham United Kingdom
Nicholas Taylor Canada
Olivier Wathelet France
Cecilia von Feilitzen Sweden
Yupei Zhao China
Jacqueline Ryan Vickery United States
Iolanda Tortajada Spain
Karen Hellekson
Emily West United States
Bridget Blodgett relative to Amanda C. Coté United States Amanda C. Coté's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Amanda C. Coté · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Blodgett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Blodgett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Blodgett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Blodgett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Blodgett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Blodgett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Blodgett. The network helps show where Bridget Blodgett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Bridget Blodgett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bridget Blodgett Line = papers co-authored together Bridget Blodgett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20200
2 201912
3 20187
4 201823
5 201781
6 20171
7 20142
8 20133
9 2012145
10 20111
11 201119
12 201013
13 20096
14 20091
15 200717

About Bridget Blodgett

Bridget Blodgett is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies, Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Science Applications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (11 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (177 citations), Communication (58 citations), Sociology and Political Science (255 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (21 citations) and Industrial relations (2 citations). Bridget Blodgett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anastasia Salter, Andrea Tapia, Eileen M. Trauth, Heng Xu, Anne Sullivan, Mary Beth Rosson and Rosalie J. Ocker. Their work appears in journals such as Information Technology and People, Television & New Media, ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Communication Culture and Critique and Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026