Malte Willer

473 citations
16 papers · 248 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Malte Willer

15 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Malte Willer
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Philosophy 146
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
  • Language and Linguistics 74
  • History and Philosophy of Science 28
  • Artificial Intelligence 107
Replace Paolo Santorio with:
Paolo Santorio United States
Matthew Mandelkern United States
Nate Charlow Canada
Brian Rabern United Kingdom
Alexis Wellwood United States
Thomas J. McKay United States
Michela Ippolito Canada
Nathan Klinedinst United Kingdom
David Liebesman Canada
V. H. Dudman Australia
Malte Willer relative to Paolo Santorio United States Paolo Santorio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Paolo Santorio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malte Willer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malte Willer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malte Willer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malte Willer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malte Willer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malte Willer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malte Willer. The network helps show where Malte Willer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Malte Willer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malte Willer Line = papers co-authored together Malte Willer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201380
2 201627
3 201721
4 201219
5 202015
6
Dynamic Thoughts on Ifs and Oughts
201414
7 201714
8 200913
9
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems
201612
10 20168
11 20208
12 20227
13 20155
14
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems : 13th International Conference, DEON 2016
20164
15 20101
16 20240

About Malte Willer

Malte Willer is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (146 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations), Language and Linguistics (74 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (107 citations). Malte Willer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Kennedy and Olivier Roy. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistics and Philosophy, Pacific philosophical quarterly, Inquiry, Topoi and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact