Breton Line
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Surgery top 1%
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Hip and Femur Fractures
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 47
- Surgery 82
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 72
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 60
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 9
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 6
- Co-authors
- Shay BessChristopher P. AmesVirginie LafageRobert A. HartFrank J. SchwabChristopher I. ShaffreyJustin S. SmithEric O. Klineberg
- Journals
- The Spine Journal (34 papers)Spine (21 papers)Neurosurgery (6 papers)World Neurosurgery (5 papers)Spine Deformity (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSerbia
In The Last Decade
Breton Line
76 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
- Surgery 2.0k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 90
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 117
- Neurology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Breton Line
This map shows the geographic impact of Breton Line's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Breton Line with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Breton Line more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Breton Line
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Breton Line. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Breton Line. The network helps show where Breton Line may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Breton Line, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 101 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 189 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 232 |
About Breton Line
Breton Line is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Neurology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (72 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (60 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (47 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (9 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (6 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Parkinson's Disease and Spinal Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.5k citations), Surgery (2.0k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (90 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (117 citations) and Neurology (59 citations). Breton Line has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Shay Bess, Christopher P. Ames, Virginie Lafage, Robert A. Hart, Frank J. Schwab, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Justin S. Smith, Eric O. Klineberg, Richard A. Hostin and Douglas C. Burton. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Spine, Neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery and Spine Deformity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.