World Neurosurgery

17.1k papers and 168.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 17.1k papers published in World Neurosurgery in the last decades have received a total of 168.7k indexed citations. Papers published in World Neurosurgery usually cover Neurology (7.3k papers), Surgery (7.2k papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.9k papers) specifically the topics of Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (2.9k papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2.9k papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Neurosurgery are Antônio Bernardo, Debraj Mukherjee, Theodore H. Schwartz, Vijay K. Anand, Chirag G. Patil, Aaron Cohen‐Gadol, Tetsuji Inagawa, Joachim Oertel, Kee B. Park and Anil Nanda.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in World Neurosurgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Neurosurgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Neurosurgery.

Countries where authors publish in World Neurosurgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Neurosurgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Neurosurgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Neurosurgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025