Ludwig Oberkircher
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Steffen RuchholtzChristopher BliemelAntonio KrügerBenjamin BueckingDaphne EschbachRené AignerBenjamin BückingJens Figiel
- Topics
- Hip and Femur Fractures (36 papers)Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (34 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (26 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchMedicine
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ludwig Oberkircher
63 papers receiving 950 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Surgery 886
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 267
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 164
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 144
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 91
Countries citing papers authored by Ludwig Oberkircher
This map shows the geographic impact of Ludwig Oberkircher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludwig Oberkircher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludwig Oberkircher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ludwig Oberkircher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludwig Oberkircher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludwig Oberkircher. The network helps show where Ludwig Oberkircher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ludwig Oberkircher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ludwig Oberkircher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ludwig Oberkircher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ludwig Oberkircher. Ludwig Oberkircher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 92 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Ludwig Oberkircher
Ludwig Oberkircher is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (36 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (34 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (886 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (267 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (91 citations). Ludwig Oberkircher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Steffen Ruchholtz, Christopher Bliemel, Antonio Krüger, Benjamin Buecking, Daphne Eschbach, René Aigner, Benjamin Bücking, Jens Figiel, David C. Noriega and Pol Maria Rommens. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.