Thomas J. Errico

13.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
266 papers, 8.7k citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Errico is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Errico has authored 266 papers receiving a total of 8.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 229 papers in Surgery, 163 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 52 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Errico's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (158 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (125 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (112 papers). Thomas J. Errico is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (158 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (125 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (112 papers). Thomas J. Errico collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Thomas J. Errico's co-authors include Virginie Lafage, Paul R. Cooper, Baron S. Lonner, John K. Houten, Aaron J. Buckland, Themistocles S. Protopsaltis, Peter G. Passias, Shay Bess, Frank Schwab and Bassel G. Diebo and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Errico

261 papers receiving 8.5k citations

Hit Papers

Surgical versus Nonsurgic... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 2014 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas J. Errico United States 50 7.4k 5.3k 1.7k 618 423 266 8.7k
Y. Raja Rampersaud Canada 42 4.0k 0.5× 3.4k 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 554 0.9× 143 0.3× 205 5.6k
Serena S. Hu United States 49 6.7k 0.9× 5.5k 1.0× 1.7k 1.0× 690 1.1× 101 0.2× 165 8.1k
Leah Y. Carreon United States 54 9.2k 1.3× 7.9k 1.5× 3.0k 1.8× 1.4k 2.3× 106 0.3× 430 11.5k
Federico P. Girardi United States 45 4.5k 0.6× 4.4k 0.8× 2.2k 1.3× 1.1k 1.8× 79 0.2× 231 5.7k
Kern Singh United States 43 6.2k 0.8× 5.2k 1.0× 1.6k 1.0× 796 1.3× 45 0.1× 442 7.9k
Shay Bess United States 59 13.6k 1.9× 9.3k 1.8× 493 0.3× 861 1.4× 105 0.2× 468 14.4k
Frank P. Cammisa United States 50 9.0k 1.2× 8.3k 1.6× 4.1k 2.5× 2.0k 3.2× 89 0.2× 320 11.5k
Ronald A. Lehman United States 43 6.5k 0.9× 4.8k 0.9× 635 0.4× 767 1.2× 82 0.2× 314 7.6k
Linda E.A. Kanim United States 30 3.2k 0.4× 2.6k 0.5× 723 0.4× 979 1.6× 313 0.7× 77 4.8k
Safdar N. Khan United States 34 3.3k 0.5× 1.9k 0.4× 768 0.5× 1000 1.6× 70 0.2× 252 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Errico

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Errico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Errico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Errico more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Errico

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Errico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Errico. The network helps show where Thomas J. Errico may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Errico

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Errico. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Errico based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Errico. Thomas J. Errico is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Stekas, Nicholas, Michael J. Moses, Frank A. Segreto, et al.. (2020). PROMIS is superior to established outcome measures in capturing disability resulting from sagittal malalignment in patients with back pain. Spine Deformity. 8(3). 499–505. 6 indexed citations
3.
George, Stephen, Matthew Spiegel, Themistocles S. Protopsaltis, et al.. (2020). Mandibular slope: a reproducible and simple measure of horizontal gaze. Spine Deformity. 8(5). 893–899. 4 indexed citations
4.
Ge, David H., Aaron Hockley, Dennis Vasquez-Montes, et al.. (2019). Total Inpatient Morphine Milligram Equivalents Can Predict Long-term Opioid Use After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine. 44(20). 1465–1470. 19 indexed citations
5.
Hockley, Aaron, David H. Ge, Dennis Vasquez-Montes, et al.. (2019). Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: An Analysis of Opioids, Nonopioid Analgesics, and Perioperative Characteristics. Global Spine Journal. 9(6). 624–629. 29 indexed citations
6.
Moses, Michael J., Jared C. Tishelman, Nicholas Stekas, et al.. (2018). Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System With Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale in Patients With Neck Pain. Spine. 44(3). E162–E167. 41 indexed citations
7.
Diebo, Bassel G., Cyrus M. Jalai, Neil V. Shah, et al.. (2018). Comparing psychological burden of orthopaedic diseases against medical conditions: Investigation on hospital course of hip, knee, and spine surgery patients. Journal of Orthopaedics. 15(2). 297–301. 28 indexed citations
8.
Passias, Peter G., Cyrus M. Jalai, Nancy Worley, et al.. (2017). Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay and 30-Day Readmission in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients: An Analysis of 3057 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Database. World Neurosurgery. 110. e450–e458. 37 indexed citations
9.
Bono, Olivia J., Gregory W. Poorman, Norah Foster, et al.. (2017). Body mass index predicts risk of complications in lumbar spine surgery based on surgical invasiveness. The Spine Journal. 18(7). 1204–1210. 50 indexed citations
11.
Cheriyan, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Unplanned Hospital Readmission After Surgical Treatment of Common Lumbar Pathologies. Spine. 40(6). 423–428. 47 indexed citations
12.
Diebo, Bassel G., Peter G. Passias, Bryan J. Marascalchi, et al.. (2015). Primary Versus Revision Surgery in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine. 40(21). 1674–1680. 56 indexed citations
13.
Sorocéanu, Alexandra, Bassel G. Diebo, Douglas C. Burton, et al.. (2015). Radiographical and Implant-Related Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine. 40(18). 1414–1421. 136 indexed citations
14.
Paul, Justin C., Baron S. Lonner, Vadim Goz, et al.. (2015). Complication rates are reduced for revision adult spine deformity surgery among high-volume hospitals and surgeons. The Spine Journal. 15(9). 1963–1972. 31 indexed citations
15.
Cheriyan, Thomas, Bradley Harris, Jerry Cheriyan, et al.. (2015). Association between compensation status and outcomes in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of 31 studies. The Spine Journal. 15(12). 2564–2573. 34 indexed citations
16.
Cheriyan, Thomas, Stephen P. Maier, Kristina Bianco, et al.. (2015). Efficacy of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. The Spine Journal. 15(4). 752–761. 190 indexed citations
17.
Lonner, Baron S., et al.. (2013). Effect of Spine Fellow Training on Operative Outcomes, Affirming Graduated Responsibility. Spine. 38(21). 1869–1874. 10 indexed citations
18.
19.
Errico, Thomas J., Robert J. Gatchel, Jerome Schofferman, et al.. (2004). A fair and balanced view of spine fusion surgery. The Spine Journal. 4(5). S129–S138. 28 indexed citations
20.
Bauer, R. D., Thomas J. Errico, Theo. R. Waugh, & Wendy A. Cohen. (1987). Evaluation and Diagnosis of Cervical Spine Injuries: A Review of the Literature. PubMed. 4(2). 71–93. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026