Christopher P. Ames
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.01%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 457
- Surgery top 0.01%
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 581
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 544
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 140
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 58
- Management of metastatic bone disease 24
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Health Informatics top 2%
-
- Medical Imaging and Analysis 56
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 24
- Co-authors
- Justin S. SmithChristopher I. ShaffreyVirginie LafageShay BessFrank J. SchwabVedat DevirenRobert A. HartJustin K. Scheer
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Christopher P. Ames
737 papers receiving 23.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 14.7k
- Surgery 21.3k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 384
- Neurology 823
- Health Informatics 70
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher P. Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher P. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher P. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher P. Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher P. Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher P. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher P. Ames. The network helps show where Christopher P. Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher P. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 121 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 84 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 20 | Stem cell horizons in intervertebral disc degeneration | 2009 | 3 |
About Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 773 papers that have together received 23.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (581 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (544 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (457 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (140 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (58 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (56 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (24 papers) and Management of metastatic bone disease (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (14.7k citations), Surgery (21.3k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (384 citations). Christopher P. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Justin S. Smith, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Virginie Lafage, Shay Bess, Frank J. Schwab, Vedat Deviren, Robert A. Hart, Justin K. Scheer, Richard A. Hostin and Douglas C. Burton. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Neurosurgery and Global Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.