Michael Frede

5.1k citations
36 papers · 583 indexed · h-index 12

Michael Frede

31 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Michael Frede
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Philosophy 444
  • Anthropology 219
  • History and Philosophy of Science 81
  • Archeology 168
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
Replace David J. Furley with:
David J. Furley United Kingdom
Gail Fine United States
Lloyd P. Gerson Canada
Myles Burnyeat United Kingdom
Jacques Brunschwig France
Gisela Striker United States
Jaap Mansfeld Netherlands
R. W. Sharples United Kingdom
John Μ. Rist Canada
R. J. Hankinson United States
Michael Frede relative to David J. Furley United Kingdom David J. Furley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David J. Furley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Frede

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Frede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Frede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Frede more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Frede

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Frede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Frede. The network helps show where Michael Frede may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Frede, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Frede Line = papers co-authored together Michael Frede links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20210
2 20213
3 20194
4
The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter
20154
5 20023
6 20018
7
Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum
200012
8 199959
9
The Original Sceptics: A Controversy
199752
10 19975
11
Les origines de la notion de cause
19891
12
Being and Becoming in Plato
19888
13
Aristoteles "Metaphysik Z"
198822
14
Aristoteles "Metaphysik Z" : Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar
19881
15 19888
16 19886
17 19784
18
Die Stoische Logik
197418
19 197419
20 19702

About Michael Frede

Michael Frede is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology and Anthropology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (22 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (1 paper), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper) and Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (444 citations), Anthropology (219 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (81 citations). Michael Frede has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Myles Burnyeat, Galen, Richard Walzer, Günther Patzig, Charlotte L. Stough, Jorge J. E. Gracia, Michael L. Morgan, Nicholas J. White, A. A. Long and G. R. F. Ferrari. Their work appears in journals such as Phronesis, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026