Bob Brecher

651 citations
36 papers · 243 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Bob Brecher

30 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Bob Brecher
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Philosophy 48
  • Political Science and International Relations 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 105
  • General Health Professions 39
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
Replace Soran Reader with:
Soran Reader United Kingdom
Richard L. Lippke United States
Meir Dan‐Cohen United States
Zenon Bańkowski United Kingdom
Lisa Sowle Cahill United States
Jeremy Horder United Kingdom
Anthony Ellis United Kingdom
Claudia Mills United States
Nurit Stadler Israel
Thomas F. Tierney United States
Bob Brecher relative to Soran Reader United Kingdom Soran Reader's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Soran Reader · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bob Brecher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Brecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Brecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Brecher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Brecher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Brecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Brecher. The network helps show where Bob Brecher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bob Brecher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bob Brecher Line = papers co-authored together Bob Brecher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201461
2 200759
3 201314
4 200214
5 201411
6 199010
7 20109
8
Getting What You Want: A Critique of Liberal Morality
19979
9 20128
10 20056
11 19905
12 20035
13 20094
14 20043
15
Education Elitism and the Market
19963
16
Liberalism and the new Europe
19933
17 19763
18 19872
19 19961
20 20111

About Bob Brecher

Bob Brecher is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, General Health Professions and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (48 citations), Political Science and International Relations (68 citations), Sociology and Political Science (105 citations), General Health Professions (39 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (2 citations). Bob Brecher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Hickey, Ron Beadle, John O’Neill, John E. Edwards, Tim Thornton, Philippe Sands, Miles Little, K. W. M. Fulford, Robyn Bluhm and Doris Schroeder. Their work appears in journals such as Araucaria, Philosophy of Management, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Ethics and Social Welfare and Nursing Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact