Meir Dan‐Cohen

852 total citations
30 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

Meir Dan‐Cohen is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Meir Dan‐Cohen has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Law, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Meir Dan‐Cohen's work include Law in Society and Culture (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). Meir Dan‐Cohen is often cited by papers focused on Law in Society and Culture (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). Meir Dan‐Cohen collaborates with scholars based in United States. Meir Dan‐Cohen's co-authors include Robert Bell, Michael D. McDonald, Debra Satz, Eva Engels, Christine M. Korsgaard, Richard B. Stewart, Harry G. Frankfurt and Michael E. Bratman and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Ethics and Harvard Law Review.

In The Last Decade

Meir Dan‐Cohen

28 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Meir Dan‐Cohen
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Law 107
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
  • Political Science and International Relations 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 80
  • Philosophy 59
Replace R. Dworkin with:
R. Dworkin United States
Wibren van der Burg Netherlands
Peter de Marneffe United States
Jeremy Horder United Kingdom
Otfried Höffe Germany
Stanley I. Benn Australia
Richard A. Wasserstrom United States
Stephen Shute United Kingdom
Kevin Vallier United States
Zenon Bańkowski United Kingdom
R. Dworkin United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Meir Dan‐Cohen
Meir Dan‐Cohen · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Meir Dan‐Cohen
Meir Dan‐Cohen · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Meir Dan‐Cohen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meir Dan‐Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meir Dan‐Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meir Dan‐Cohen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meir Dan‐Cohen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meir Dan‐Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meir Dan‐Cohen. The network helps show where Meir Dan‐Cohen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meir Dan‐Cohen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meir Dan‐Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meir Dan‐Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meir Dan‐Cohen. Meir Dan‐Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Free Exercise Clause
1
2
Sich selbst ernst nehmen
3
3 4
4 1
5
The Authority of the Self
1
6 12
7 3
8
Thinking Criminal Law
1
9 1
10 12
11 5
12 1
13 4
14
Listeners and Eavesdroppers: Substantive Legal Theory and Its Audience
3
15 1
16 5
17 4
18 2
19
Rights, persons, and organizations
19
20 92

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026