Doris Schroeder

56 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Doris Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Business and International Management 22
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 293
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 57
  • General Health Professions 193
Replace Fiona J. Newton with:
Fiona J. Newton Australia
Sheena Carlisle United Kingdom
Ana Viseu Canada
Johann Mouton South Africa
Sharla Alegria United States
Rob Hagendijk Netherlands
John Eyers United Kingdom
Ronald B. Larson United States
Bart Penders Netherlands
Jacqueline Leta Brazil
Doris Schroeder relative to Fiona J. Newton Australia Fiona J. Newton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Fiona J. Newton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Schroeder. The network helps show where Doris Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doris Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doris Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together Doris Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20244
3 20241
4 20231
5 20191
6 201916
7 201933
8 201528
9 20114
10 201114
11 20106
12 200955
13 200998
14 200924
15 20083
16 200758
17 200620
18 20068
19 20056
20
Applied ethics: critical concepts in philosophy
200110

About Doris Schroeder

Doris Schroeder is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Law, having authored 58 papers that have together received 895 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (12 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers) and International Maritime Law Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (19 citations), Business and International Management (22 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (293 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (57 citations) and General Health Professions (193 citations). Doris Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cyprus and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eugenijus Gefenas, Roger Chennells, Konstantinos Iatridis, Rachel Wynberg, Garrath Williams, Kate Chatfield, Thomas Pogge, Clare Palmer, Vasantha Muthuswamy and Michelle Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Research Ethics, Res Publica, Nature Medicine and Journal of Responsible Innovation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026