Bingjia Shao
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Marketing top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 1%
- Communication top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Co-authors
- Bo XuHongquan ChenDonald R. JonesWenfang FanWei GaoPhilip Andrews‐SpeedChenglin LiaoLei Shi
- Topics
- Digital Marketing and Social Media (25 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (14 papers)Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Bingjia Shao
31 papers receiving 842 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Sociology and Political Science 478
- Marketing 290
- Information Systems and Management 278
- Communication 132
- Computer Science Applications 123
Countries citing papers authored by Bingjia Shao
This map shows the geographic impact of Bingjia Shao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bingjia Shao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bingjia Shao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bingjia Shao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bingjia Shao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bingjia Shao. The network helps show where Bingjia Shao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bingjia Shao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bingjia Shao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bingjia Shao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bingjia Shao. Bingjia Shao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Avatars in live streaming commerce: The influence of anthropomorphism on consumers' willingness to accept virtual live streamersbreakdown → | 44 |
| 5 | 65 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 116 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | Study on Ecological Niches and Enterprise E-business | 1 |
About Bingjia Shao
Bingjia Shao is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Marketing and Business and International Management, having authored 34 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (25 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (14 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (278 citations), Marketing (290 citations) and Computer Science Applications (123 citations). Bingjia Shao has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Bo Xu, Hongquan Chen, Donald R. Jones, Wenfang Fan, Wei Gao, Philip Andrews‐Speed, Chenglin Liao, Lei Shi, Li Liu and Dahui Li. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Frontiers in Psychology and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.