Bill Schroder

788 citations
12 papers · 499 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Bill Schroder

11 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Bill Schroder
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Strategy and Management 387
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 123
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 142
  • Business and International Management 20
  • Accounting 87
Replace Stephen Preece with:
Stephen Preece Canada
Charles Ramangalahy Canada
Esther Sánchez Peinado Spain
Klaus Macharzina Germany
Maria-Cristina Stoian United Kingdom
Jean‐Pierre Jeannet United States
Tony Cox United Kingdom
Roger Schweizer Sweden
Hela Chebbi France
Tiia Vissak Estonia
Bill Schroder relative to Stephen Preece Canada Stephen Preece's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Stephen Preece · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Schroder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Schroder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Schroder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Schroder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Schroder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Schroder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Schroder. The network helps show where Bill Schroder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Bill Schroder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bill Schroder Line = papers co-authored together Bill Schroder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2006363
2 200847
3 199622
4 199920
5 200616
6 20029
7 20098
8 19945
9 19935
10 19982
11
The Chinese Steel Industry in Transition: Industry Perspective on Innovation Policy
20141
12 20021

About Bill Schroder

Bill Schroder is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 12 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (2 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (387 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (123 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (142 citations), Business and International Management (20 citations) and Accounting (87 citations). Bill Schroder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ron Edwards, Susan Freeman, Mark Farrell, Glenda Crosling, Margaret Jekanyika Matanda, Felix Mavondo, Tim Wallace, Paul Steffens and Xueli Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Agribusiness, Industrial Marketing Management, European Journal of Marketing, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) and Journal of International Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact