Bill Fulford

568 citations
29 papers · 248 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers)Ethics in medical practice (9 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers)

In The Last Decade

Bill Fulford

24 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Bill Fulford
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • General Health Professions 122
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Philosophy 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 48
Replace Tania Gergel with:
Tania Gergel United Kingdom
Çlare Oakley United Kingdom
Gill Pinner United Kingdom
Neely Myers United States
Carol Martin United Kingdom
Carolyn Quadrio Australia
Yolande Voskes Netherlands
Matthias Glöckner Germany
Tony Maden United Kingdom
Danielle Spencer United States
Bill Fulford relative to Tania Gergel United Kingdom Tania Gergel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Tania Gergel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Fulford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Fulford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Fulford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Fulford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Fulford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Fulford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Fulford. The network helps show where Bill Fulford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill Fulford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill Fulford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill Fulford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bill Fulford. Bill Fulford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 2
4 2
5 15
6 0
7 28
8 1
9 0
10 3
11 2
12 1
13 5
14 15
15 10
16
Values-based practice in primary care: easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence.
67
17
Right, wrong and respect.
1
18 22
19 3
20
Informed consent in psychiatry: cross cultural and philosophical issues.
1

About Bill Fulford

Bill Fulford is a scholar working on Philosophy, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (73 citations), General Health Professions (122 citations) and Clinical Psychology (95 citations). Bill Fulford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Dale, John Z. Sadler, Donna Dickenson, Ajit Shah, K. W. M. Fulford, Natalie Banner, Chris Millard, John P. Turner, Mathew Thomson and John Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Patient Education and Counseling and The Lancet Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026