Matthias Glöckner
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Thomas KallertMatthias SchützwohlStefan PriebeJiří RabochFrancisco Torres‐GonzálezGeorgi OnchevAndrzej KiejnaAnastasia Karastergiou
- Topics
- Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers)Health and Medical Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- The British Journal of PsychiatrySocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric EpidemiologyEuropean Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- GermanyPolandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matthias Glöckner
10 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Clinical Psychology 341
- Psychiatry and Mental health 151
- Philosophy 88
- General Health Professions 62
- Social Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Glöckner
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Glöckner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Glöckner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Glöckner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Glöckner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Glöckner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Glöckner. The network helps show where Matthias Glöckner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthias Glöckner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthias Glöckner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthias Glöckner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthias Glöckner. Matthias Glöckner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86 | |
| 2 | 125 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | The EUNOMIA project on coercion in psychiatry: study design and preliminary data. | 81 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 33 |
About Matthias Glöckner
Matthias Glöckner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers) and Health and Medical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (341 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (151 citations) and Philosophy (88 citations). Matthias Glöckner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Kallert, Matthias Schützwohl, Stefan Priebe, Jiří Raboch, Francisco Torres‐González, Georgi Onchev, Andrzej Kiejna, Anastasia Karastergiou, Algirdas Dembinskas and Lars Kjellin. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.