Benjamin Schleich

4.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
176 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Benjamin Schleich is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Schleich has authored 176 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 132 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 70 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 39 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Schleich's work include Manufacturing Process and Optimization (112 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (38 papers) and Design Education and Practice (31 papers). Benjamin Schleich is often cited by papers focused on Manufacturing Process and Optimization (112 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (38 papers) and Design Education and Practice (31 papers). Benjamin Schleich collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Benjamin Schleich's co-authors include Sandro Wartzack, Nabil Anwer, Luc Mathieu, Stefan Goetz, Kristina Wärmefjord, Rikard Söderberg, Benjamin Haefner, Reiner Anderl, Andreas Kuhnle and Gisela Lanza and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Journal of Operational Research and Sensors.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Schleich

168 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

Shaping the digital twin for design and production engine... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 2023 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Schleich Germany 23 2.3k 895 601 347 337 176 3.0k
Nabil Anwer France 27 3.2k 1.4× 1.3k 1.5× 1.1k 1.8× 293 0.8× 536 1.6× 136 4.2k
Rikard Söderberg Sweden 28 2.5k 1.1× 1.2k 1.3× 815 1.4× 684 2.0× 179 0.5× 269 3.4k
Jean‐Yves Dantan France 25 1.5k 0.7× 704 0.8× 395 0.7× 521 1.5× 182 0.5× 117 2.2k
Jaime A. Camelio United States 27 1.5k 0.7× 714 0.8× 417 0.7× 229 0.7× 126 0.4× 85 2.5k
Ramy Harik United States 25 1.3k 0.6× 1.0k 1.1× 650 1.1× 226 0.7× 199 0.6× 108 2.7k
Dariusz Ceglarek United Kingdom 38 3.6k 1.6× 2.2k 2.5× 570 0.9× 931 2.7× 479 1.4× 198 5.3k
Richard A. Wysk United States 33 2.7k 1.2× 576 0.6× 389 0.6× 223 0.6× 222 0.7× 170 3.8k
Paul Maropoulos United Kingdom 28 1.4k 0.6× 1.8k 2.0× 162 0.3× 313 0.9× 403 1.2× 143 3.1k
Deyi Xue Canada 33 1.4k 0.6× 1.1k 1.3× 187 0.3× 1.0k 2.9× 371 1.1× 139 3.2k
Guanghui Zhou China 30 1.6k 0.7× 678 0.8× 224 0.4× 141 0.4× 58 0.2× 106 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Schleich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Schleich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Schleich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Schleich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Schleich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Schleich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Schleich. The network helps show where Benjamin Schleich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Schleich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Schleich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Schleich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Schleich. Benjamin Schleich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jung, Do-Hyun, et al.. (2025). A universal Recycling Index to quantify the recyclability of products: A case study. Procedia CIRP. 135. 480–485.
2.
Metternich, Joachim, et al.. (2025). Using the Integral Digital Twin for Product Carbon Footprint calculation. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 16. 100258–100258. 1 indexed citations
3.
Schleich, Benjamin, et al.. (2025). Knowledge-based feedback of product information into product design. Procedia CIRP. 136. 582–587.
4.
Roth, Martin, et al.. (2024). Generating Manufacturing Distributions for Sampling-based Tolerance Analysis using Deep Learning Models. Procedia CIRP. 129. 103–108. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kempf, Florian, Klaus Schilling, Thomas Hulin, et al.. (2024). AI-enabled Cyber–Physical In-Orbit Factory - AI approaches based on digital twin technology for robotic small satellite production. Acta Astronautica. 217. 1–17. 7 indexed citations
6.
8.
Schleich, Benjamin, et al.. (2023). Integrating Views of Digital Twins in the Strategic Planning of Cyber-Physical Products. AHFE international. 1 indexed citations
9.
Winter, Sven, et al.. (2023). PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT WITH DIGITAL TWINS FOR PRODUCT GENERATION DEVELOPMENT. Proceedings of the Design Society. 3. 2955–2964. 3 indexed citations
10.
Anderl, Reiner, et al.. (2023). FRAMEWORK FOR COMPARISON OF PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINTS OF DIFFERENT MANUFACTURING SCENARIOS. Proceedings of the Design Society. 3. 1935–1944. 4 indexed citations
11.
Campean, Felician, et al.. (2023). PERSPECTIVES ON ROBUST DESIGN – AN OVERVIEW OF CHALLENGES AND RESEARCH AREAS ACROSS INDUSTRY FIELDS. Proceedings of the Design Society. 3. 2885–2894. 4 indexed citations
12.
Anderl, Reiner, et al.. (2023). FILE FORMAT SELECTION FOR EFFICIENT DIGITAL PROCESS CHAINS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. Proceedings of the Design Society. 3. 1875–1884. 2 indexed citations
13.
Goetz, Stefan, Martin Roth, & Benjamin Schleich. (2021). Early Robust Design—Its Effect on Parameter and Tolerance Optimization. Applied Sciences. 11(20). 9407–9407. 11 indexed citations
14.
Schleich, Benjamin, et al.. (2021). Process and machine selection in sampling-based tolerance-cost optimisation for dimensional tolerancing. International Journal of Production Research. 60(17). 5201–5216. 15 indexed citations
15.
Lechner, Michael, et al.. (2021). Functional Analysis of Components Manufactured by a Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming Process. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 5(2). 49–49. 2 indexed citations
16.
Schleich, Benjamin, et al.. (2021). Comparative evaluation of WIMP and immersive natural finger interaction: a user study on CAD assembly modeling. Virtual Reality. 26(1). 143–158. 9 indexed citations
17.
Schleich, Benjamin, et al.. (2021). DIGITAL TWINS - DEFINITIONS, CLASSES AND BUSINESS SCENARIOS FOR DIFFERENT INDUSTRY SECTORS. Proceedings of the Design Society. 1. 1293–1302. 34 indexed citations
18.
Miehling, Jörg, Benjamin Schleich, & Sandro Wartzack. (2020). Digitale Zwillinge und Digitale Zwillingspaare im Kontext des Digital Engineerings. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 115(s1). 55–57. 5 indexed citations
19.
Marian, Max, et al.. (2020). tribAIn—Towards an Explicit Specification of Shared Tribological Understanding. Applied Sciences. 10(13). 4421–4421. 21 indexed citations
20.
Wartzack, Sandro, et al.. (2017). Toleranzmanagement im Kontext von Industrie 4.0. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 112(3). 170–172. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026