William Theodore De Bary
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Steven W. MayJohn W. ChaffeeDonald S. ZagoriaIrene BloomJulia ChingYunshik ChangDavid L. HallLks Ho
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers)Japanese History and Culture (5 papers)Indian and Buddhist Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong Kong
In The Last Decade
William Theodore De Bary
14 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 236
- Political Science and International Relations 123
- Cultural Studies 68
- Philosophy 54
- Social Psychology 41
Countries citing papers authored by William Theodore De Bary
This map shows the geographic impact of William Theodore De Bary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Theodore De Bary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Theodore De Bary more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Theodore De Bary
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Theodore De Bary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Theodore De Bary. The network helps show where William Theodore De Bary may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Theodore De Bary
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Theodore De Bary. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Theodore De Bary based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Theodore De Bary. William Theodore De Bary is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sources of East Asian tradition | 10 |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 114 | |
| 4 | Sources of Korean Tradition | 16 |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | Eastern canons : approaches to the Asian classics | 5 |
| 8 | Approaches to the Asian Classics | 9 |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 67 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | Five Women Who Loved Love | 1 |
About William Theodore De Bary
William Theodore De Bary is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (68 citations), Religious studies (34 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (236 citations). William Theodore De Bary has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Steven W. May, John W. Chaffee, Donald S. Zagoria, Irene Bloom, Julia Ching, Yunshik Chang, David L. Hall, Lks Ho, Hahm Chaibong and Daniel A. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The Journal of Higher Education and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.