Ben Mead
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 7
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 5
- Genetics top 2%
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 4
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 6
- Cancer Research top 10%
-
- Extracellular vesicles in disease 12
- Retinal Development and Disorders 12
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 4
-
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 12
- Co-authors
- Stanislav I. TomarevAnn LoganMartin BerryWendy LeadbeaterBen A. SchevenZubair AhmedJuan AmaralRobert A. H. Scott
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (6 papers)Stem Cells (2 papers)Stem Cells Translational Medicine (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Ben Mead
37 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Ophthalmology 511
- Genetics 503
- Developmental Neuroscience 151
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 354
- Cancer Research 281
Countries citing papers authored by Ben Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Mead. The network helps show where Ben Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 106 | |
| 11 | Neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cells by BMSC-derived exosomes | 2019 | 2 |
| 12 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 83 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 171 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 167 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 17 |
About Ben Mead
Ben Mead is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Extracellular vesicles in disease (12 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (12 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (511 citations), Genetics (503 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (151 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (354 citations) and Cancer Research (281 citations). Ben Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stanislav I. Tomarev, Ann Logan, Martin Berry, Wendy Leadbeater, Ben A. Scheven, Zubair Ahmed, Juan Amaral, Robert A. H. Scott, Lisa J. Hill and Richard J. Blanch. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Stem Cells, Stem Cells Translational Medicine, Experimental Eye Research and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.