Philip N. Lewis
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Keith M. MeekRobert D. YoungAndrew J. QuantockCarlo KnuppChristian PinaliTomas WhiteMay GriffithOleksiy Buznyk
- Topics
- Corneal surgery and disorders (15 papers)Corneal Surgery and Treatments (12 papers)Connective tissue disorders research (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingOphthalmologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Philip N. Lewis
28 papers receiving 759 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 513
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 318
- Ophthalmology 128
- Cell Biology 117
- Molecular Biology 91
Countries citing papers authored by Philip N. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip N. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip N. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip N. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip N. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip N. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip N. Lewis. The network helps show where Philip N. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip N. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip N. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip N. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip N. Lewis. Philip N. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 96 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | Identification of an extensive fibre system in ‘pre-Descemet’s layer’ (PDL) of the cornea using serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM) | 1 |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 45 | |
| 20 | Three Dimensional Structural Organisation of Collagen Proteoglycan Interactions in the Cornea | 1 |
About Philip N. Lewis
Philip N. Lewis is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Genetics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (15 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (12 papers) and Connective tissue disorders research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (513 citations), Ophthalmology (128 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (318 citations). Philip N. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Keith M. Meek, Robert D. Young, Andrew J. Quantock, Carlo Knupp, Christian Pinali, Tomas White, May Griffith, Oleksiy Buznyk, Per Fagerholm and Sally Hayes. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.