James Smith

37 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers

James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Small Animals 291
  • Animal Science and Zoology 318
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 54
  • Genetics 148
Replace Jennifer A. Larsen with:
Jennifer A. Larsen United States
David G. Bristol United States
Margaret White United States
Min‐Kyu Kim South Korea
Esther Mahabir Germany
Harendra Kumar India
Hiroyuki Izumi Japan
Yael Harari United States
Martyn Regan United Kingdom
Lisa Manning United Kingdom
James Smith relative to Jennifer A. Larsen United States Jennifer A. Larsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Jennifer A. Larsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014107
2 201789
3 199276
4 202168
5 199366
6 199157
7 199456
8 198349
9 201546
10 201636
11 199332
12 201831
13 201828
14 199228
15
Regulatory Considerations for Gene Therapy Products in the US, EU, and Japan.
201724
16 201621
17 201621
18 202220
19 201514
20 202012

About James Smith

James Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Economics and Econometrics, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (291 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (318 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (54 citations) and Genetics (148 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. M. Cronin, David Brindley, H.V. Masey O’Neill, M.R. Bedford, T.H. McCallum, Georg A. Holländer, Jennifer Camaradou, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Andrew Carr and Andrew Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Nature Biotechnology, World Patent Information, Journal of Tissue Engineering and Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact