Stem Cells Translational Medicine

1.7k papers and 61.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 61.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (775 papers), Genetics (663 papers) and Surgery (519 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (633 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (385 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (316 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cells Translational Medicine are Arnold I. Caplan, Yongmin Yan, Stanislav I. Tomarev, Ben Mead, Daoyan Wei, Xiangsheng Zuo, Michael G. Fehlings, Rocky S. Tuan, Anthony Atala and Scott Maxson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Stem Cells Translational Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cells Translational Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cells Translational Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025