Naama Friedmann

7.3k citations
135 papers · 4.1k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Naama Friedmann

132 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Naama Friedmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
  • Language and Linguistics 688
  • Statistics and Probability 467
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 518
Replace Elisabet Service with:
Elisabet Service Finland
Fernando Cuetos Spain
Cristina Burani Italy
Gloria Waters United States
Julia L. Evans United States
Ben Ambridge United Kingdom
Marc F. Joanisse Canada
Brenda Rapp United States
Régine Kolinsky Belgium
Karla K. McGregor United States
Naama Friedmann relative to Elisabet Service Finland Elisabet Service's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Elisabet Service · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naama Friedmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naama Friedmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naama Friedmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naama Friedmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naama Friedmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naama Friedmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naama Friedmann. The network helps show where Naama Friedmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naama Friedmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Naama Friedmann Line = papers co-authored together Naama Friedmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008313
2 1997283
3 2004234
4 2003120
5 2006117
6 2010115
7 2012109
8 2017100
9 200195
10 200194
11 200782
12 200382
13 201581
14 200580
15 200274
16 200870
17 200662
18 200761
19 201157
20 201153

About Naama Friedmann

Naama Friedmann is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 135 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (81 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (62 papers), Language Development and Disorders (54 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (27 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (21 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (16 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (3.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Language and Linguistics (688 citations), Statistics and Probability (467 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (518 citations). Naama Friedmann has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Rama Novogrodsky, Aviah Gvion, Luigi Rizzi, Adriana Belletti, Yosef Grodzinsky, Einat Shetreet, Dror Dotan, Lewis P. Shapiro, Uri Hadar and Joāo Costa. Their work appears in journals such as Cortex, Frontiers in Psychology, Lingua, Aphasiology and Cognitive Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact