Beate Priewasser

430 total citations
9 papers, 219 citations indexed

About

Beate Priewasser is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Beate Priewasser has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 219 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Beate Priewasser's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). Beate Priewasser is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). Beate Priewasser collaborates with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Beate Priewasser's co-authors include Josef Perner, Eva Rafetseder, Johannes Roessler, Tobias Schuwerk, Beate Sodian, Jason Low, Diane Poulin‐Dubois, Lindsey J. Powell, Ted Ruffman and Ulf Liszkowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Cognitive Development and Royal Society Open Science.

In The Last Decade

Beate Priewasser

9 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Beate Priewasser Austria	6	194	102	100	34	28	9	219
Deanna M. Macris United States	7	181 0.9×	105 1.0×	111 1.1×	51 1.5×	55 2.0×	7	276
Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann Germany	7	213 1.1×	167 1.6×	126 1.3×	18 0.5×	34 1.2×	28	314
Jessica Yott Canada	7	258 1.3×	147 1.4×	105 1.1×	13 0.4×	17 0.6×	7	283
Mika Asaba United States	7	111 0.6×	93 0.9×	80 0.8×	34 1.0×	11 0.4×	20	215
Stipe Grgas Croatia	2	244 1.3×	119 1.2×	113 1.1×	29 0.9×	15 0.5×	18	327
Brandon Matthew Woo United States	9	161 0.8×	98 1.0×	139 1.4×	46 1.4×	11 0.4×	17	244
Karin Strid Sweden	9	183 0.9×	121 1.2×	67 0.7×	25 0.7×	7 0.3×	12	239
Denis Tatone United Kingdom	7	255 1.3×	100 1.0×	154 1.5×	44 1.3×	14 0.5×	15	314
Dóra Kampis Denmark	7	156 0.8×	80 0.8×	105 1.1×	6 0.2×	27 1.0×	17	202

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Priewasser

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Priewasser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Priewasser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Priewasser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Priewasser

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Priewasser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Priewasser. The network helps show where Beate Priewasser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beate Priewasser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beate Priewasser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beate Priewasser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beate Priewasser. Beate Priewasser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Deneault, Audrey‐Ann, et al.. (2023). Mentalizing in first-time fathers: reflective functioning as a mediator between attachment representation and sensitivity. Attachment & Human Development. 25(5). 544–565. 3 indexed citations

Huemer, Michael, et al.. (2021). Preschoolers’ understanding of misrepresentation: Why the false sign test overestimates performance in german-speaking children. 1 indexed citations

Priewasser, Beate, et al.. (2019). Mistaken Max befriends Duplo girl: No difference between a standard and an acted-out false belief task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 191. 104756–104756. 3 indexed citations

Perner, Josef, Beate Priewasser, & Johannes Roessler. (2018). The practical other: teleology and its development. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 43(2). 99–114. 12 indexed citations

Poulin‐Dubois, Diane, Hannes Rakoczy, Sebastian Dörrenberg, et al.. (2018). Do infants understand false beliefs? We don’t know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate’s commentary. Cognitive Development. 48. 302–315. 75 indexed citations

Schuwerk, Tobias, Beate Priewasser, Beate Sodian, & Josef Perner. (2018). The robustness and generalizability of findings on spontaneous false belief sensitivity: a replication attempt. Royal Society Open Science. 5(5). 172273–172273. 45 indexed citations

Priewasser, Beate, et al.. (2017). Helping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: Mentalism or Teleology?. Cognitive Development. 46. 69–78. 42 indexed citations

Brandl, Johannes L., et al.. (2015). Young children’s protest: what it can (not) tell us about early normative understanding. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 14(4). 719–740. 6 indexed citations

Priewasser, Beate, Johannes Roessler, & Josef Perner. (2012). Competition as rational action: Why young children cannot appreciate competitive games. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 116(2). 545–559. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact