Conrad Totman

1.2k citations
52 papers · 483 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Conrad Totman

43 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Conrad Totman
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Cultural Studies 126
  • Anthropology 55
  • Geography, Planning and Development 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 183
  • Museology 14
Replace Bernard W. Sheehan with:
Bernard W. Sheehan United States
Patricia Nelson Limerick United States
Elliott West United States
Richard Francaviglia United States
David McCreery United States
Ronald N. Satz United States
Karen Ordahl Kupperman United States
Bernard Debarbieux Switzerland
Peter Boomgaard Netherlands
Rhoads Murphey United States
Conrad Totman relative to Bernard W. Sheehan United States Bernard W. Sheehan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Bernard W. Sheehan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Totman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Totman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Totman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Totman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Totman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Totman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Totman. The network helps show where Conrad Totman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Conrad Totman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conrad Totman Line = papers co-authored together Conrad Totman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198984
2 199253
3
A History of Japan
200048
4
Early Modern Japan
199344
5 199529
6 197315
7 199114
8 196813
9 198512
10 200412
11 200110
12 196510
13 201410
14 198910
15
Japan: An Environmental History
20148
16 19808
17 19927
18 19687
19 19657
20 19666

About Conrad Totman

Conrad Totman is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 52 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (26 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers), Cambodian History and Society (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Central European Literary Studies (1 paper) and Urban and spatial planning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (126 citations), Anthropology (55 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations), Sociology and Political Science (183 citations) and Museology (14 citations). Conrad Totman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Robertson, Thomas C. Smith, Marius B. Jansen, Pauline Thompson, R. P. Dore, Constantine Nomikos Vaporis, Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi, George Elison, Bardwell L. Smith and John W. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Asian Studies, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Journal of Japanese Studies and Monumenta Nipponica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact