Anthony Smith

7.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
53 papers, 5.6k citations indexed

About

Anthony Smith is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anthony Smith has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 5.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Rheumatology, 37 papers in Surgery and 10 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Anthony Smith's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (43 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (26 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (12 papers). Anthony Smith is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (43 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (26 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (12 papers). Anthony Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Anthony Smith's co-authors include Anders Mattiasson, Linda Brubaker, Kari Bø, John O. L. DeLancey, Richard C. Bump, Peter Klarskov, Bob L. Shull, D. W. Warrell, Gordon Hosker and J. A. Gosling and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Gut and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Anthony Smith

52 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ... 1990 2026 2002 2014 1996 1990 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anthony Smith United Kingdom 18 5.2k 4.5k 1.1k 814 465 53 5.6k
Charles W. Nager United States 38 4.2k 0.8× 3.4k 0.7× 1.5k 1.3× 1.2k 1.4× 386 0.8× 124 4.8k
Halina M. Zyczynski United States 39 5.0k 1.0× 4.2k 0.9× 1.3k 1.1× 1.0k 1.2× 281 0.6× 130 5.4k
Alison C. Weidner United States 35 3.7k 0.7× 3.3k 0.7× 837 0.7× 578 0.7× 250 0.5× 99 4.1k
Joseph I. Schaffer United States 32 3.1k 0.6× 2.6k 0.6× 938 0.8× 903 1.1× 292 0.6× 82 4.0k
Gabriel N. Schaer Switzerland 26 6.4k 1.2× 4.1k 0.9× 3.3k 2.9× 1.8k 2.2× 408 0.9× 52 6.9k
Mickey M. Karram United States 39 3.7k 0.7× 2.9k 0.6× 1.4k 1.3× 661 0.8× 276 0.6× 158 4.4k
Anthony G. Visco United States 42 4.8k 0.9× 4.3k 1.0× 1.4k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 403 0.9× 128 6.5k
Philip Toozs‐Hobson United Kingdom 28 2.7k 0.5× 1.7k 0.4× 1.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 305 0.7× 137 3.2k
Donald R. Ostergard United States 29 2.5k 0.5× 1.9k 0.4× 1.2k 1.1× 772 0.9× 197 0.4× 122 3.3k
Hans Peter Dietz Australia 59 11.2k 2.2× 10.1k 2.2× 1.8k 1.5× 1.2k 1.5× 1.7k 3.6× 434 12.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Smith. The network helps show where Anthony Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Smith. Anthony Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Segar, Julia, et al.. (2023). Does variation of surgical technique affect native tissue anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair outcomes?. International Urogynecology Journal. 35(1). 51–58. 2 indexed citations
2.
Reid, Fiona, et al.. (2023). The impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic sensation: a prospective cohort study. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 1535–1535. 4 indexed citations
3.
Reid, Fiona, Lorna Aucott, Cathryn Glazener, et al.. (2022). PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal. 34(1). 67–78. 8 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Anthony, et al.. (2021). An assessment of techniques and practices used to elevate intra‐abdominal pressure when assessing pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 40(3). 783–790. 4 indexed citations
5.
Segar, Julia, et al.. (2019). Surgical technique used in the UK for native tissue anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair (VaST). International Urogynecology Journal. 31(8). 1519–1525. 4 indexed citations
6.
Dwyer, Lucy, et al.. (2019). Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight. International Urogynecology Journal. 30(12). 2041–2048. 7 indexed citations
9.
Gopinath, Deepa, et al.. (2012). Why don’t women participate? A qualitative study on non-participation in a surgical randomised controlled trial. International Urogynecology Journal. 24(6). 969–975. 17 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Anthony, Walter Artibani, & Marcus J. Drake. (2011). Managing unsatisfactory outcome after mid‐urethral tape insertion. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 30(5). 771–774. 8 indexed citations
11.
Fayyad, Abdalla, et al.. (2007). How accurate is symptomatic and clinical evaluation of prolapse prior to surgical repair?. International Urogynecology Journal. 18(10). 1179–1183. 25 indexed citations
12.
Reid, Fiona, Anthony Smith, & Graham Dunn. (2006). Which questionnaire? A psychometric evaluation of three patient‐based outcome measures used to assess surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 26(1). 123–128. 17 indexed citations
13.
Higgs, P, et al.. (2005). Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 112(8). 1134–1138. 131 indexed citations
14.
Arunkalaivanan, A. S. & Anthony Smith. (2002). Bladder calculus after laparoscopic colposuspension. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 22(1). 101–101. 8 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Anthony & S. L. Stanton. (1998). Laparoscopic colposuspension. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 105(4). 383–384. 5 indexed citations
16.
Prior, Alison, et al.. (1992). Effect of hysterectomy on anorectal and urethrovesical physiology.. Gut. 33(2). 264–267. 51 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Anthony, Gordon Hosker, & D. W. Warrell. (1989). The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(1). 29–32. 197 indexed citations
18.
Gilpin, S.A., J. A. Gosling, Anthony Smith, & D. W. Warrell. (1989). The pathogenesis of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A histological and histochemical study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(1). 15–23. 200 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Anthony, Gordon Hosker, & D. W. Warrell. (1989). The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(1). 24–28. 337 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Anthony, et al.. (1981). Effects of indwelling urinary catheters in male cats. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 17(3). 427–433. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026