Charles W. Nager
- Rheumatology top 0.05%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Urology top 0.2%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Emily S. LukaczKarl M. LuberJean M. LawrenceHolly E. RichterJoseph I. SchafferDolores H. PretoriusRichard ContrerasShawn A. Menefee
- Topics
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments (107 papers)Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (74 papers)Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (40 papers)
- Cited by
- RheumatologyUrologySurgery
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Charles W. Nager
119 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Rheumatology 4.2k
- Surgery 3.4k
- Urology 1.5k
- Epidemiology 1.2k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 386
Countries citing papers authored by Charles W. Nager
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles W. Nager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles W. Nager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles W. Nager more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles W. Nager
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles W. Nager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles W. Nager. The network helps show where Charles W. Nager may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles W. Nager
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles W. Nager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles W. Nager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles W. Nager. Charles W. Nager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Preoperative Urodynamics in Women with Predominant Stress Urinary Incontinence Increases Physician Confidence, but Confidence Increase Is Not Associated with Better Outcomes. | 1 |
| 9 | 69 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 120 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 71 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 278 | |
| 17 | 113 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 133 |
About Charles W. Nager
Charles W. Nager is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Urology and Surgery, having authored 124 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (107 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (74 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (40 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (4.2k citations), Urology (1.5k citations) and Surgery (3.4k citations). Charles W. Nager has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Emily S. Lukacz, Karl M. Luber, Jean M. Lawrence, Holly E. Richter, Joseph I. Schaffer, Dolores H. Pretorius, Richard Contreras, Shawn A. Menefee, Linda Brubaker and Matthew D. Barber. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.