Gordon Hosker

3.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Gordon Hosker is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gordon Hosker has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Rheumatology, 25 papers in Surgery and 11 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Gordon Hosker's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (39 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (22 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (11 papers). Gordon Hosker is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (39 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (22 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (11 papers). Gordon Hosker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Gordon Hosker's co-authors include Anthony Smith, D. W. Warrell, E S Kiff, Miriam Brazzelli, Christine Norton, G. J. Bugg, June D Cody, Gunnar Lose, Peter Thind and Daniele Perucchini and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British journal of surgery and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

Gordon Hosker

44 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological ... 1990 2026 2002 2014 1990 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gordon Hosker United Kingdom 18 1.9k 1.5k 622 327 218 45 2.1k
B. Fatton France 23 2.0k 1.1× 1.8k 1.2× 501 0.8× 258 0.8× 96 0.4× 98 2.2k
Bernhard Schuessler Switzerland 18 1.5k 0.8× 1.1k 0.7× 613 1.0× 268 0.8× 177 0.8× 47 1.6k
Charlotte Chaliha United Kingdom 21 1.2k 0.6× 844 0.6× 487 0.8× 310 0.9× 151 0.7× 41 1.4k
Dorothy Kammerer-Doak United States 22 1.9k 1.0× 1.6k 1.1× 635 1.0× 339 1.0× 158 0.7× 41 2.2k
Michelle Fynes United Kingdom 21 1.2k 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 470 0.8× 148 0.5× 135 0.6× 51 1.5k
Kaven Baeßler Germany 30 4.4k 2.3× 4.2k 2.8× 510 0.8× 435 1.3× 289 1.3× 86 4.7k
Ka Lai Shek Australia 37 4.0k 2.1× 3.6k 2.4× 535 0.9× 381 1.2× 531 2.4× 167 4.1k
R. Edward Varner United States 23 1.2k 0.7× 964 0.7× 412 0.7× 278 0.9× 158 0.7× 54 1.9k
Shawn A. Menefee United States 28 2.7k 1.4× 2.1k 1.4× 953 1.5× 581 1.8× 111 0.5× 89 3.1k
Bob L. Shull United States 6 3.6k 1.9× 3.3k 2.2× 667 1.1× 545 1.7× 236 1.1× 9 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Gordon Hosker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon Hosker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon Hosker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon Hosker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon Hosker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon Hosker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon Hosker. The network helps show where Gordon Hosker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gordon Hosker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gordon Hosker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gordon Hosker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gordon Hosker. Gordon Hosker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mitchell, Peter, et al.. (2012). Viscoelastic Assessment of Anal Canal Function Using Acoustic Reflectometry. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 55(2). 211–217. 9 indexed citations
2.
Hosker, Gordon, et al.. (2011). Fatigue rate of the external anal sphincter. Colorectal Disease. 14(9). 1095–1100. 7 indexed citations
3.
Mitchell, Peter, et al.. (2011). Anal Acoustic Reflectometry: A New Reproducible Technique Providing Physiological Assessment of Anal Sphincter Function. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 54(9). 1122–1128. 13 indexed citations
4.
Smith, ARB, et al.. (2009). The effect of physical activity on pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 116(6). 824–828. 17 indexed citations
5.
Reid, Fiona, et al.. (2009). The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study. International Urogynecology Journal. 20(4). 443–445. 6 indexed citations
7.
Hosker, Gordon, et al.. (2008). Liverpool Ultrasound Pictorial Chart: the development of a new method of documenting anal sphincter injury diagnosed by endoanal ultrasound. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 115(6). 767–772. 5 indexed citations
8.
Hosker, Gordon, et al.. (2006). A valsalvometer can be effective in standardising the Valsalva manoeuvre. International Urogynecology Journal. 18(5). 499–502. 15 indexed citations
10.
Bugg, G. J., Gordon Hosker, & E S Kiff. (2005). Routine symptom screening for postnatal urinary and anal incontinence in new mothers from a district. International Urogynecology Journal. 16(5). 405–408. 11 indexed citations
11.
Telford, Karen, et al.. (2004). Fatigability of the External Anal Sphincter in Anal Incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 47(5). 746–752. 27 indexed citations
12.
Dolan, Lucia, et al.. (2003). Opening detrusor pressure and the influence of age on success following colposuspension. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 23(1). 10–15. 2 indexed citations
13.
Hosker, Gordon, Christine Norton, & Miriam Brazzelli. (2002). Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults (Cochrane review). Research Portal (King's College London). 2. 17 indexed citations
14.
Hosker, Gordon, et al.. (2002). Strength-Duration Testing of the External Anal Sphincter in Females with Anorectal Dysfunction. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 45(1). 83–90. 6 indexed citations
15.
Hosker, Gordon, Christine Norton, & Miriam Brazzelli. (2000). Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD001310–CD001310. 18 indexed citations
16.
Norton, Christine, Gordon Hosker, & Miriam Brazzelli. (2000). Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD002111–CD002111. 56 indexed citations
17.
Davies, Julia A., Gordon Hosker, Joanne Lord, & Anthony Smith. (2000). An Evaluation of the Efficacy of In-Patient Bladder Retraining. International Urogynecology Journal. 11(5). 271–276. 3 indexed citations
18.
Hosker, Gordon, et al.. (1997). Urodynamic services, personnel and training in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Urology. 79(2). 159–162. 10 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Anthony, Gordon Hosker, & D. W. Warrell. (1989). The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(1). 29–32. 197 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Anthony, Gordon Hosker, & D. W. Warrell. (1989). The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(1). 24–28. 337 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026