Robert Stone

61 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Human-Computer Interaction 258
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 254
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 17
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 139
  • Conservation 31
Replace Karin Laumann with:
Karin Laumann Norway
João Falcão Carneiro Portugal
Daniel James Australia
Wenxi Chen Japan
Jennifer Burke United States
Joon-Ho Choi United States
Alessandro Miani Italy
Peter Fischer Germany
Kyle Johnsen United States
Richard L. Neitzel United States
Robert Stone relative to Karin Laumann Norway Karin Laumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Karin Laumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stone. The network helps show where Robert Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stone Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
1999129
2 2011122
3 200472
4 201768
5 196955
6 200151
7 200347
8 200341
9 200240
10 200039
11 200139
12 201736
13
MIST VR. A laparoscopic surgery procedures trainer and evaluator.
199736
14 197436
15 201531
16 201831
17 201131
18 197030
19 201926
20 201622

About Robert Stone

Robert Stone is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Geology, Health Informatics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Social Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (9 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (7 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (258 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (254 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (17 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (139 citations) and Conservation (31 citations). Robert Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rory McCloy, Michael H. Depledge, Chris Sutton, R F McCloy, James B. Wood, Abdus Sattar Chaudhry, Pia Rotshtein, Alex W. Stedmon, Marie E. McEnery and William A. Müller. Their work appears in journals such as PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Journal of Phycology, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026