Countries citing papers authored by Anthony J. Sanford
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony J. Sanford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony J. Sanford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony J. Sanford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony J. Sanford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony J. Sanford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony J. Sanford. The network helps show where Anthony J. Sanford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony J. Sanford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony J. Sanford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony J. Sanford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony J. Sanford. Anthony J. Sanford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Emmott, Catherine, Anthony J. Sanford, & Mary Jane Alexander. (2013). Rhetorical control of readers' attention: psychological and stylistic perspectives on foreground and background in narrative. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).
4.
Emmott, Catherine & Anthony J. Sanford. (2012). Noticing and not noticing what's in a text: attention, depth of processing and text interpretation. 5(5). 398–398.1 indexed citations
Ferguson, Heather J., Anthony J. Sanford, & Christoph Scheepers. (2008). On-line Investigations of Theory of Mind Reasoning.. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).1 indexed citations
Ferguson, Heather J., Anthony J. Sanford, & Hartmut Leuthold. (2007). Real-World Interference in Detecting Violations of Counterfactual and Negated Worlds. UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
9.
Emmott, Catherine, Anthony J. Sanford, & Eugene J. Dawydiak. (2007). Stylistics meets cognitive science: studying style in fiction and readers' attention from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style. 41(2). 204.10 indexed citations
10.
Ferguson, Heather J., Anthony J. Sanford, & Hartmut Leuthold. (2006). Detecting violations in real- and counterfactual- world contexts: Eye- movements and ERP analysis. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Sanford, Anthony J. & P. N. Johnson‐Laird. (2003). The Nature and Limits of Human Understanding: the 2001 Gifford Lectures at the University of Glasgow. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).5 indexed citations
Paterson, Helena, Frank Pollick, & Anthony J. Sanford. (2001). The Role of Velocity in Affect Discrimination. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).33 indexed citations
Sanford, Anthony J. & Linda M. Moxey. (1995). Aspects of coherence in written language. 161.1 indexed citations
17.
Sanford, Anthony J.. (1990). The control of attentional focus by quantifiers. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).9 indexed citations
18.
Sanford, Anthony J.. (1989). Language understanding and the cognitive ergonomics of style. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
19.
Sanford, Anthony J.. (1987). The Mind of Man: Models of Human Understanding. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.