N.E. Loveless

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

N.E. Loveless is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, N.E. Loveless has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in N.E. Loveless's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (12 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers). N.E. Loveless is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (12 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers). N.E. Loveless collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Canada. N.E. Loveless's co-authors include Anthony J. Sanford, Michael J. Simpson, Risto Näätänen, Riitta Hari, Sari Levänen, Linda K. McEvoy, Mikko Sams, John Brebner, Patrick Hamilton and Veikko Jousmäki and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Psychophysiology.

In The Last Decade

N.E. Loveless

28 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials 1982 2026 1996 2011 1982 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N.E. Loveless United Kingdom 19 1.7k 598 240 136 104 29 1.9k
Robert F. Hink United States 15 2.3k 1.4× 791 1.3× 185 0.8× 207 1.5× 49 0.5× 20 2.7k
Berry Wijers Netherlands 5 1.1k 0.7× 484 0.8× 118 0.5× 110 0.8× 100 1.0× 8 1.4k
S. A. Hillyard United States 8 2.0k 1.2× 449 0.8× 207 0.9× 240 1.8× 86 0.8× 9 2.2k
Carl E. Sherrick United States 18 1.5k 0.9× 770 1.3× 231 1.0× 116 0.9× 32 0.3× 29 1.8k
Vincent L. Schwent United States 7 1.8k 1.1× 643 1.1× 107 0.4× 103 0.8× 37 0.4× 8 1.9k
Richard Ragot France 22 1.5k 0.9× 550 0.9× 150 0.6× 109 0.8× 105 1.0× 37 1.6k
Piotr Jaśkowskí Poland 30 2.3k 1.4× 564 0.9× 308 1.3× 230 1.7× 73 0.7× 86 2.7k
Richard Simson United States 16 2.4k 1.4× 602 1.0× 147 0.6× 320 2.4× 35 0.3× 16 2.6k
S Mäntysalo Finland 7 2.3k 1.4× 988 1.7× 134 0.6× 223 1.6× 208 2.0× 12 2.5k
Connie C. Duncan‐Johnson United States 11 2.1k 1.2× 478 0.8× 232 1.0× 249 1.8× 36 0.3× 15 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by N.E. Loveless

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.E. Loveless's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.E. Loveless with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.E. Loveless more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.E. Loveless

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.E. Loveless. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.E. Loveless. The network helps show where N.E. Loveless may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N.E. Loveless

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N.E. Loveless. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N.E. Loveless based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N.E. Loveless. N.E. Loveless is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Loveless, N.E., et al.. (2000). Sluggish auditory processing in dyslexics is not due to persistence in sensory memory. Neuroreport. 11(9). 1903–1906. 6 indexed citations
2.
McEvoy, Linda K., Sari Levänen, & N.E. Loveless. (1997). Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: Neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology. 34(3). 308–316. 72 indexed citations
3.
Levänen, Sari, N.E. Loveless, & Linda K. McEvoy. (1996). Persisting versus sustained neural activity. Neuroreport. 7(8). 1389–1392. 2 indexed citations
4.
Loveless, N.E., Sari Levänen, Veikko Jousmäki, Mikko Sams, & Riitta Hari. (1996). Temporal integration in auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 100(3). 220–228. 111 indexed citations
5.
Loveless, N.E., et al.. (1994). Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralisation: III. Monaural and binaural shift responses. Hearing Research. 81(1-2). 91–99. 34 indexed citations
6.
Loveless, N.E. & Riitta Hari. (1993). Auditory evoked fields covary with perceptual grouping. Biological Psychology. 35(1). 1–15. 30 indexed citations
7.
Imada, Toshiaki, Riitta Hari, N.E. Loveless, Linda K. McEvoy, & Mikko Sams. (1993). Determinants of the auditory mismatch response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 87(3). 144–153. 75 indexed citations
8.
Loveless, N.E. & C.H.M. Brunia. (1990). Effects of rise-time on late components of the auditory evoked potential. Journal of Psychophysiology. 4. 367–378. 15 indexed citations
9.
Loveless, N.E., et al.. (1989). Evoked responses of human auditory cortex may be enhanced by preceding stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 74(3). 217–227. 82 indexed citations
10.
Donchin, Emanuel, Earle F. Heffley, Steven A. Hillyard, et al.. (1984). Cognition and Event‐Related Potentials II. The Orienting Reflex and P300. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 425(1). 39–57. 89 indexed citations
11.
Loveless, N.E.. (1980). Aging Effects in Simple RT and Voluntary Movement Paradigms. Progress in brain research. 54. 547–551. 20 indexed citations
12.
Loveless, N.E.. (1977). Event-related brain potentials in selective response. Biological Psychology. 5(2). 135–149. 12 indexed citations
13.
Loveless, N.E.. (1975). The effect of warning interval on signal detection and event-related slow potentials of the brain. Perception & Psychophysics. 17(6). 565–570. 27 indexed citations
14.
Loveless, N.E. & Anthony J. Sanford. (1975). The impact of warning signal intensity on reaction time and components of the contingent negative variation. Biological Psychology. 2(3). 217–226. 112 indexed citations
15.
Loveless, N.E. & Anthony J. Sanford. (1974). Slow potential correlates of preparatory set. Biological Psychology. 1(4). 303–314. 261 indexed citations
16.
Loveless, N.E. & Anthony J. Sanford. (1974). Effects of Age on the Contingent Negative Variation and Preparatory Set in a Reaction-Time Task. Journal of Gerontology. 29(1). 52–63. 114 indexed citations
17.
Loveless, N.E.. (1973). The contingent negative variation related to preparatory set in a reaction time situation with variable foreperiod. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 35(4). 369–374. 33 indexed citations
18.
Loveless, N.E.. (1962). DIRECTION-OF-MOTION STEREOTYPES: A REVIEW. Ergonomics. 5(2). 357–383. 87 indexed citations
19.
Loveless, N.E. & Dennis H. Holding. (1959). Reaction Time and Tracking Ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 9(3). 134–134. 2 indexed citations
20.
Loveless, N.E.. (1956). DISPLAY‐CONTROL RELATIONSHIPS ON CIRCULAR AND LINEAR SCALES. British Journal of Psychology. 47(4). 271–282. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026