Lynne M. Reder

11.1k citations
126 papers · 7.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 45

Lynne M. Reder

121 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Hit Papers

Situated Learning and Education8561996202620062016250500750

Peers

Lynne M. Reder
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.6k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 3.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • General Decision Sciences 191
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 175
Replace Earl Hunt with:
Earl Hunt United States
Peter A. Frensch Germany
Arthur S. Reber United States
Fernand Gobet United Kingdom
David E. Kieras United States
James W. Pellegrino United States
Michael E. J. Masson Canada
Jukka Hyönä Finland
Kevin Dunbar United States
Mary L. Gick Canada
Lynne M. Reder relative to Earl Hunt United States Earl Hunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Earl Hunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lynne M. Reder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynne M. Reder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynne M. Reder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynne M. Reder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynne M. Reder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynne M. Reder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynne M. Reder. The network helps show where Lynne M. Reder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lynne M. Reder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lynne M. Reder Line = papers co-authored together Lynne M. Reder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2 20215
3 20201
4
Word frequency affects binding probability not memory precision.
20191
5 201972
6 20188
7 201424
8 201421
9 201311
10 20108
11 200988
12 200862
13 200610
14 200533
15 200520
16 200269
17
EDUCACIÓN: EL CONSTRUCTIVISMO RADICAL Y LA PSICOLOGÍA COGNITIVA*
20013
18
Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology
199862
19 199670
20 1996251

About Lynne M. Reder

Lynne M. Reder is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 7.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (52 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (30 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (21 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (20 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (20 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (20 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (17 papers) and Topic Modeling (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.6k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.6k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations). Lynne M. Reder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and France. Frequent co-authors include John R. Anderson, Herbert A. Simon, Frank E. Ritter, Michael S. Ayers, Jason Arndt, Christian D. Schunn, Rachel A. Diana, Heekyeong Park, John Anderson and Christian Lebière. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026