Annelise Russell
- Communication top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Libby HemphillBryan D. JonesJoshua M. RosenbergSpencer P. GreenhalghBryan T. GervaisHeather K. EvansNichole M. BauerPeter Bjerre Mortensen
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (21 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers)Media Studies and Communication (9 papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Educational TechnologySocial Science QuarterlyPolitical Research Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumDenmark
In The Last Decade
Annelise Russell
25 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Communication 193
- Political Science and International Relations 189
- Sociology and Political Science 115
- Strategy and Management 61
- Gender Studies 48
Countries citing papers authored by Annelise Russell
This map shows the geographic impact of Annelise Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelise Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelise Russell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annelise Russell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelise Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelise Russell. The network helps show where Annelise Russell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelise Russell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelise Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelise Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelise Russell. Annelise Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | The Rhetorical Agenda: What Twitter Tells Us About Congressional Attention | 3 |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Annelise Russell
Annelise Russell is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (21 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (193 citations), Political Science and International Relations (189 citations) and Gender Studies (48 citations). Annelise Russell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Libby Hemphill, Bryan D. Jones, Joshua M. Rosenberg, Spencer P. Greenhalgh, Bryan T. Gervais, Heather K. Evans, Nichole M. Bauer, Peter Bjerre Mortensen, Maxwell E. McCombs and Paromita Pain. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Technology, Social Science Quarterly and Political Research Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.