Maxwell E. McCombs

500 total citations
14 papers, 148 citations indexed

About

Maxwell E. McCombs is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Maxwell E. McCombs has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 148 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Communication, 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Maxwell E. McCombs's work include Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper) and Media Studies and Communication (1 paper). Maxwell E. McCombs is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper) and Media Studies and Communication (1 paper). Maxwell E. McCombs collaborates with scholars based in United States. Maxwell E. McCombs's co-authors include David H. Weaver, Donald L. Shaw, Sebastián Valenzuela, Annelise Russell, Paromita Pain and Hong Tien Vu and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Communication, The Volta Review and Journalism Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Maxwell E. McCombs

13 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Maxwell E. McCombs United States	6	93	65	19	11	11	14	148
Rainer Mathes Germany	4	121 1.3×	90 1.4×	30 1.6×	27 2.5×	10 0.9×	12	181
Renate Köcher	4	117 1.3×	69 1.1×	36 1.9×	22 2.0×	12 1.1×	6	190
Epp Lauk Finland	8	77 0.8×	72 1.1×	38 2.0×	14 1.3×	5 0.5×	33	174
Eugene F. Shaw United States	6	126 1.4×	98 1.5×	20 1.1×	7 0.6×	22 2.0×	11	226
María Löblich Germany	7	101 1.1×	76 1.2×	37 1.9×	16 1.5×	9 0.8×	26	184
Philippe J. Maarek France	5	121 1.3×	67 1.0×	65 3.4×	23 2.1×	8 0.7×	21	198
Nancy Snow United States	7	99 1.1×	98 1.5×	65 3.4×	8 0.7×	9 0.8×	23	252
Siegfried Weischenberg Germany	9	170 1.8×	85 1.3×	46 2.4×	14 1.3×	16 1.5×	36	293
Vinzenz Wyss Switzerland	8	150 1.6×	56 0.9×	11 0.6×	5 0.5×	13 1.2×	33	227
Martin Löffelholz Germany	8	136 1.5×	73 1.1×	21 1.1×	7 0.6×	4 0.4×	29	188

Countries citing papers authored by Maxwell E. McCombs

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maxwell E. McCombs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maxwell E. McCombs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maxwell E. McCombs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maxwell E. McCombs

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maxwell E. McCombs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maxwell E. McCombs. The network helps show where Maxwell E. McCombs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maxwell E. McCombs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maxwell E. McCombs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maxwell E. McCombs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maxwell E. McCombs. Maxwell E. McCombs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Vu, Hong Tien, Maxwell E. McCombs, Annelise Russell, & Paromita Pain. (2020). Deepening the concept of ‘compelling arguments’. 4(2). 219–240. 5 indexed citations

2.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (2013). Communication and Democracy. 80 indexed citations

3.

McCombs, Maxwell E., Donald L. Shaw, & David H. Weaver. (2013). The Press, Candidate Images, and Voter Perceptions. 43–54. 8 indexed citations

4.

McCombs, Maxwell E., Donald L. Shaw, & David H. Weaver. (2013). Agenda Setting and Priming: Conceptual Links and Differences. 65–80. 7 indexed citations

5.

McCombs, Maxwell E.. (2009). Agenda setting : nastolování agendy: masová média a veřejné mínění.. 2 indexed citations

6.

Valenzuela, Sebastián & Maxwell E. McCombs. (2007). Agenda-Setting Effects on Vote Choice: Evidence From the 2006 Mexican Election. 1–45. 11 indexed citations

7.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (2007). Second-Level Agenda-Setting and Affective Intelligence: Fluctuations of Public Perceptions of Foreign Nations. 1–32. 3 indexed citations

8.

Shaw, Donald L., et al.. (1996). Advanced Reporting: Discovering Patterns in News Events. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 9 indexed citations

9.

McCombs, Maxwell E.. (1975). Measuring the Cumulative Agenda-Setting Influence of the Mass Media.. 5 indexed citations

10.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (1972). The Interpersonal/Mass Communication Interface among Church Leaders. Journal of Communication. 22(3). 257–262. 4 indexed citations

11.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (1971). Research in Brief: The Graphics of Prose.. Visible Language. 5 indexed citations

12.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (1971). The Graphics of Prose. Journalism Quarterly. 48(1). 134–136. 6 indexed citations

13.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (1969). Descriptive Style of Deaf Children.. The Volta Review. 1 indexed citations

14.

McCombs, Maxwell E., et al.. (1969). Perceptual Selection and Communication. Journalism Quarterly. 46(2). 352–355. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact