Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems
1991650 citationsFrank R. Baumgartner, Bryan D. Jonesprofile →
Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective
2009322 citationsFrank R. Baumgartner, Christian Breunig et al.profile →
From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing
2012282 citationsBryan D. Jones, Frank R. Baumgartnerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bryan D. Jones
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bryan D. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bryan D. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bryan D. Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bryan D. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bryan D. Jones. The network helps show where Bryan D. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bryan D. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bryan D. Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bryan D. Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bryan D. Jones. Bryan D. Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Green‐Pedersen, Christoffer, et al.. (2011). The Dynamics of policy change in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies. 44(8). 945–1119.7 indexed citations
Jones, Bryan D., László Zalányi, Frank R. Baumgartner, & Péter Érdi. (2009). Dynamic threshold modeling of budget changes. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 61–66.1 indexed citations
11.
Brouard, Sylvain, John Wilkerson, Frank R. Baumgartner, et al.. (2009). Comparing Legislative Production: Issues and Methods. Revue internationale de politique comparée. 16(3). 381–404.3 indexed citations
12.
Wilkerson, John, Frank R. Baumgartner, Sylvain Brouard, et al.. (2009). The Comparative Agenda Project: Objectives and Content. 16(3). 365–379.1 indexed citations
13.
Lam, S., Ruth Oulton, Bryan D. Jones, et al.. (2008). 2008 CONFERENCE ON LASERS AND ELECTRO-OPTICS & QUANTUM ELECTRONICS AND LASER SCIENCE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9. Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.1 indexed citations
Jones, Bryan D., G. Taylor, P. C. Efthimion, et al.. (2001). Electron Bernstein Wave (EBW) Emission, Heating and Current Drive Research in CDX-U and NSTX. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 43.1 indexed citations
18.
Jones, Bryan D., et al.. (1993). Can IT (information technology) help in Working for Patients.. PubMed. 89(2). 13–6.1 indexed citations
Jones, Bryan D.. (1989). Leadership and politics : new perspectives in political science. University Press of Kansas eBooks.47 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.