Social Science Quarterly

2.7k papers and 58.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Social Science Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 58.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Science Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.4k papers), Political Science and International Relations (845 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (438 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (640 papers), Social Media and Politics (249 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Quarterly are Frederick Solt, Susan L. Cutter, Bryan Boruff, Grace Kao, Mark Warr, Eszter Hargittai, Marta Tienda, Douglas S. Massey, Steven Greene and Steven Stack.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Science Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Social Science Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025