Anne O’Connor

416 citations
19 papers · 283 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anne O’Connor

19 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Anne O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Family Practice 46
  • Occupational Therapy 50
  • Research and Theory 10
  • General Health Professions 139
  • Applied Psychology 20
Replace Caitlin Pike with:
Caitlin Pike United States
Jacira dos Santos Oliveira Brazil
Hilde Smith‐Strøm Norway
Dawn Ernstzen South Africa
Robyn Davies Canada
Carman Turkelson United States
Jayne Donaldson United Kingdom
Helen Fernandez United States
Simone Maria Muniz da Silva Bezerra Brazil
Tony LaDuca United States
Anne O’Connor relative to Caitlin Pike United States Caitlin Pike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Caitlin Pike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne O’Connor. The network helps show where Anne O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Anne O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Anne O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201396
2 201242
3 201735
4 202219
5 201713
6
The development and evaluation of a common assessment form for physiotherapy practice education in Ireland.
200713
7 201811
8 201810
9 20219
10 20116
11 20206
12 20225
13 20175
14 20204
15 20203
16 20122
17 20092
18 20201
19 20191

About Anne O’Connor

Anne O’Connor is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions, Family Practice and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (1 paper) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (46 citations), Occupational Therapy (50 citations), Research and Theory (10 citations), General Health Professions (139 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). Anne O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Arlene McCurtin, Jonathan J. Dick, Bryan Smith, Shantanu Nundy, Peter Cantillon, Elizabeth McKay, Rabia R. Razi, Mairéad Cahill, David Meltzer and Oliver McGarr. Their work appears in journals such as Physiotherapy, Medical Teacher, Nursing and Health Sciences, The Clinical Teacher and Disability & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact