Anne M. Farrell
- Accounting top 5%
- Dermatology top 2%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Surgery
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan H. GrenierJustin LeibyClareann H. BunkerAnthony RoweKathryn KadousKristy L. TowryJoshua Oon Soo GohBrian J. White
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers)Genital Health and Disease (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Anne M. Farrell
50 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Accounting 263
- Dermatology 182
- Safety Research 157
- Surgery 143
- Management Information Systems 138
Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Farrell
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Farrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Farrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Farrell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Farrell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Farrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Farrell. The network helps show where Anne M. Farrell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne M. Farrell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne M. Farrell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne M. Farrell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne M. Farrell. Anne M. Farrell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Financial Incentives Differentially Regulate Neural Processing of Positive and Negative Emotions During Decision-Making | 0 |
| 5 | 213 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | Accuracy in Judging the Nonlinear Effects of Cost and Profit Drivers | 1 |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | Lichen sclerosus: evidence that immunological changes occur at all levels of the skin. | 32 |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Anne M. Farrell
Anne M. Farrell is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Accounting, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (84 citations), Accounting (263 citations) and Dermatology (182 citations). Anne M. Farrell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan H. Grenier, Justin Leiby, Clareann H. Bunker, Anthony Rowe, Kathryn Kadous, Kristy L. Towry, Joshua Oon Soo Goh, Brian J. White, Fenella Wojnarowska and S. Laube. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Financial Economics and The Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.