F. M. Charnock
Impact in
- Urology top 5%
- Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Genital Health and Disease 4
-
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 3
- Co-authors
- Fenella Wojnarowska (3 shared papers)Margaret O’Brien (1 shared paper)TS Ganesan (1 shared paper)Nigel P. Groome (1 shared paper)Inez Cooke (1 shared paper)P. Marren (1 shared paper)Anne M. Farrell (2 shared papers)Michael Bunce (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Dermatology (2 papers)British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (1 paper)Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (1 paper)Dermatology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
F. M. Charnock
12 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Urology 66
- Reproductive Medicine 66
- Rheumatology 86
- Surgery 191
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 27
Countries citing papers authored by F. M. Charnock
This map shows the geographic impact of F. M. Charnock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. M. Charnock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. M. Charnock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. M. Charnock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. M. Charnock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. M. Charnock. The network helps show where F. M. Charnock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside F. M. Charnock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 10 | |
| 10 | The Bowen double-bladed scalpel for the reconstruction of scars. | 1994 | 9 |
| 11 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 1 |
About F. M. Charnock
F. M. Charnock is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Rheumatology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genital Health and Disease (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (66 citations), Reproductive Medicine (66 citations), Rheumatology (86 citations), Surgery (191 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (27 citations). F. M. Charnock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fenella Wojnarowska, Margaret O’Brien, TS Ganesan, Nigel P. Groome, Inez Cooke, P. Marren, Anne M. Farrell, Michael Bunce, K. I. Welsh and P R Millard. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.