Anne Lanceley

3.5k citations
96 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 25

Anne Lanceley

90 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Anne Lanceley
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Conservation 119
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 278
  • Reproductive Medicine 283
  • Oncology 757
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 32
Replace Kerry A. Sherman with:
Kerry A. Sherman Australia
Melanie A. Price Australia
Mary Jane Esplen Canada
Christine Kerr France
Claudia Lampic Sweden
Anita Y. Kinney United States
Julia Shelley Australia
Lidia Schapira United States
Richard P. McQuellon United States
Michael A. Richards United Kingdom
Anne Lanceley relative to Kerry A. Sherman Australia Kerry A. Sherman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kerry A. Sherman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Lanceley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Lanceley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Lanceley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Lanceley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Lanceley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Lanceley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Lanceley. The network helps show where Anne Lanceley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Lanceley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Lanceley Line = papers co-authored together Anne Lanceley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20242
3 20240
4 20243
5 20231
6 20232
7 202213
8 201920
9 20187
10 201731
11 201715
12 201716
13 201616
14 201619
15 201551
16 201329
17
Development of an EORTC module for the assessment of cancer related fatigue (EORTC FAR-15): Phase III results.
20071
18 20053
19 19956
20 198556

About Anne Lanceley

Anne Lanceley is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Conservation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology and General Health Professions, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (24 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (19 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (15 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (119 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (278 citations), Reproductive Medicine (283 citations), Oncology (757 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations). Anne Lanceley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Usha Menon, Lindsay Fraser, Lucy Side, Sue Gessler, Ian Jacobs, Belinda Rahman, Dimitrios A. Koutoukidis, Helen J. Chatterjee, M. Tish Knobf and Linda Thomson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, BMJ Open, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Psycho-Oncology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026