Adam Glaser

6.1k total citations
147 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Adam Glaser is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam Glaser has authored 147 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 60 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 54 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Adam Glaser's work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (59 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (29 papers) and Family Support in Illness (27 papers). Adam Glaser is often cited by papers focused on Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (59 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (29 papers) and Family Support in Illness (27 papers). Adam Glaser collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Adam Glaser's co-authors include Richard Feltbower, Richard Wagland, Jessica Corner, Christine Eiser, Amy Downing, Penny Wright, Patricia Sloper, Anna Gavin, Marilyn Crawshaw and Juliet Hale and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Adam Glaser

139 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adam Glaser United Kingdom 36 1.4k 1.2k 1.2k 752 494 147 3.7k
Helen M. Parsons United States 30 1.2k 0.8× 861 0.7× 947 0.8× 592 0.8× 374 0.8× 92 2.8k
F. Lennie Wong United States 32 1.8k 1.2× 1.5k 1.2× 1.4k 1.2× 321 0.4× 624 1.3× 140 4.8k
Olga Husson Netherlands 41 1.8k 1.3× 1.0k 0.9× 2.7k 2.3× 1.1k 1.4× 998 2.0× 242 5.4k
Eric Linn United States 3 1.3k 0.9× 994 0.8× 3.0k 2.6× 590 0.8× 1.1k 2.2× 6 4.8k
Keith M. Bellizzi United States 35 2.0k 1.4× 1.0k 0.9× 2.5k 2.1× 1.3k 1.7× 514 1.0× 81 4.7k
Noreen M. Aziz United States 30 1.6k 1.1× 1.4k 1.2× 3.2k 2.7× 905 1.2× 622 1.3× 40 5.1k
Lidia Schapira United States 33 746 0.5× 1.2k 1.0× 2.1k 1.8× 594 0.8× 551 1.1× 185 4.7k
Larissa Nekhlyudov United States 41 1.0k 0.7× 1.4k 1.2× 3.1k 2.6× 618 0.8× 735 1.5× 174 5.1k
Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra‐Weebers Netherlands 43 2.1k 1.4× 922 0.8× 1.4k 1.2× 1.8k 2.4× 496 1.0× 109 5.0k
Tim Eden United Kingdom 43 2.7k 1.8× 2.5k 2.1× 979 0.8× 418 0.6× 495 1.0× 124 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Glaser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Glaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Glaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Glaser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Glaser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Glaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Glaser. The network helps show where Adam Glaser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Glaser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Glaser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Glaser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Glaser. Adam Glaser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murray, Robert, et al.. (2025). Diabetes Risk After Treatment for Childhood and Young Adult Cancer. Diabetes Care. 48(4). 519–527.
2.
Feltbower, Richard, et al.. (2024). Identifying social outcomes of importance for childhood cancer survivors: an e-Delphi study. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 8(1). 14–14. 2 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, Kathryn, et al.. (2024). Early educational attainment in children with major congenital anomaly in the UK. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 109(4). 326–333. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rogers, Zoe, Adam Glaser, James W.F. Catto, et al.. (2023). Health‐related quality of life after a diagnosis of bladder cancer: a longitudinal survey over the first year. British Journal of Urology. 133(4). 460–473. 7 indexed citations
7.
Clark, Stephen, et al.. (2021). Understanding Barriers to Novel Data Linkages: Topic Modeling of the Results of the LifeInfo Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(5). e24236–e24236. 15 indexed citations
9.
Cavers, Debbie, Annemieke Bikker, Karen Barnett, et al.. (2019). BPOS Oral Presentations. Psycho-Oncology. 28(S2). 3–8. 2 indexed citations
10.
Wagland, Richard, Lauren Matheson, Carol Rivas, et al.. (2019). Adjustment strategies amongst black African and black Caribbean men following treatment for prostate cancer: Findings from the Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study. European Journal of Cancer Care. 29(1). e13183–e13183. 11 indexed citations
11.
Retzer, Ameeta, Thomas Keeley, Khaled Ahmed, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of patient-reported outcome protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study qualitative protocol. BMJ Open. 8(2). e017282–e017282. 7 indexed citations
12.
Wagland, Richard, et al.. (2018). The challenges on the family unit faced by younger couples affected by prostate cancer: A qualitative study. Psycho-Oncology. 28(2). 329–335. 11 indexed citations
13.
Young, Alastair L., Ian Rowe, Kate Absolom, et al.. (2016). The effect of Liver Transplantation on the quality of life of the recipient's main caregiver – a systematic review. Liver International. 37(6). 794–801. 18 indexed citations
14.
Ahmed, Khaled, Derek Kyte, Thomas Keeley, et al.. (2016). Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol. BMJ Open. 6(9). e012863–e012863. 16 indexed citations
15.
Corner, Jessica, et al.. (2013). Qualitative analysis of patients’ feedback from a PROMs survey of cancer patients in England. BMJ Open. 3(4). e002316–e002316. 82 indexed citations
16.
Glaser, Adam, Lorna Fraser, Jessica Corner, et al.. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes of cancer survivors in England 1–5 years after diagnosis: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 3(4). e002317–e002317. 99 indexed citations
17.
Phillips, Bob, Kate Absolom, Dan Stark, & Adam Glaser. (2010). A simple practical patient-reported clinic satisfaction measure for young adults. British Journal of Cancer. 103(10). 1485–1488. 5 indexed citations
18.
Crawshaw, Marilyn, Adam Glaser, & Allan Pacey. (2007). The use of pornographic materials by adolescent male cancer patients when banking sperm in the UK: Legal and ethical dilemmas. Human Fertility. 10(3). 159–163. 13 indexed citations
19.
Squire, Roly, et al.. (2006). Radiotherapy for life‐threatening mediastinal hemangioma with Kasabach–Merritt syndrome. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 49(5). 739–744. 23 indexed citations
20.
Eiser, Christine, Helena Davies, Meriel Jenney, Chris Stride, & Adam Glaser. (2005). HRQOL implications of treatment with dexamethasone for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 46(1). 35–39. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026