Matthew Boal

3.8k total citations
22 papers, 191 citations indexed

About

Matthew Boal is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Boal has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 191 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Matthew Boal's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (16 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (7 papers). Matthew Boal is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (16 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (7 papers). Matthew Boal collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Matthew Boal's co-authors include Nader Francis, Sandro Pasquali, Ravinder Vohra, Derek Alderson, Ewen A. Griffiths, Timothy Rogers, David Griffith, Danail Stoyanov, Evangelos B. Mazomenos and James P. Blackmur and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, British journal of surgery and Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Boal

18 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Matthew Boal

SURGE

PRM

CCM

PHEOH

N. Odom United Kingdom

Jad Malas United States

Christina J. Gutowski United States

Borja Suberviola Spain

Alice L. Zhou United States

Antonio Coppolino United States

A. Hirji Canada

José Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz Spain

Daniel Enter United States

Qiudong Chen United States

N. Odom United Kingdom

Matthew Boal

223 ×1.5

SURGE

73 ×1.1

PRM

56 ×1.4

50 ×1.4

CCM

24 ×0.8

PHEOH

Citations per year, relative to Matthew Boal Matthew Boal (= 1×) peers N. Odom

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Boal

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Boal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Boal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Boal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Boal

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Boal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Boal. The network helps show where Matthew Boal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Boal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Boal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Boal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Boal. Matthew Boal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Boal, Matthew, et al.. (2025). Evaluation of current and emerging endoluminal robotic platforms using the IDEAL framework. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 34(4). 253–266. 1 indexed citations

Boal, Matthew, Rauand Duhoky, Tania Gill, et al.. (2025). Association of skill and errors with outcomes in robotic rectal cancer surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 40(3). 2085–2094.

Fadel, Michael G, Matthew Boal, Marina Yiasemidou, et al.. (2025). Essential components and validation of multi-specialty robotic surgical training curricula: a systematic review. International Journal of Surgery. 111(4). 2791–2809. 1 indexed citations

Curtis, Nathan, Jialang Xu, Matthew Boal, et al.. (2025). A Rectal Cancer Surgery Dataset: Use of artificial intelligence to aid automation of error identification. Scientific Data. 12(1). 180–180.

Tandon, D. A., Ayush Gupta, Roma Patel, et al.. (2025). The impact of online teaching curricula on undergraduate basic surgical skills acquisition. Surgery Open Science. 27. 8–14.

Lingam, Govinda Ishwar, et al.. (2025). Standardising robotic system setup: an international expert consensus. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(11). 7640–7648.

Boal, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Development and evaluation of a societal core robotic surgery accreditation curriculum for the UK. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 18(1). 305–305. 7 indexed citations

Boal, Matthew, Adeola Olaitan, Dhivya Chandrasekaran, et al.. (2024). Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic‐assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(8). 1480–1497. 2 indexed citations

Fadel, Michael G, Francesca Pecchini, Muhammed Elhadi, et al.. (2024). European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC): Protocol for the development of a consensus in robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery trainees. PLoS ONE. 19(5). e0302648–e0302648. 5 indexed citations

10.

Boal, Matthew, et al.. (2024). A review of minimal access surgery provision and training within the United Kingdom. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 18(1). 234–234. 3 indexed citations

11.

Boal, Matthew, Dimitra Anastasiou, Jiajie Xu, et al.. (2024). Deep learning prediction of error and skill in robotic prostatectomy suturing. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(12). 7663–7671. 4 indexed citations

12.

Mahendran, V, et al.. (2024). Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(4). 1758–1774. 8 indexed citations

13.

Fadel, Michael G, Francesca Pecchini, Marina Yiasemidou, et al.. (2024). A pan-European survey of robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery: European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC) initiative. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(2). 907–921. 6 indexed citations

14.

Xu, Jialang, et al.. (2024). SEDMamba: Enhancing Selective State Space Modelling With Bottleneck Mechanism and Fine-to-Coarse Temporal Fusion for Efficient Error Detection in Robot-Assisted Surgery. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 10(1). 232–239. 1 indexed citations

15.

Boal, Matthew, et al.. (2023). The application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in the assessment of basic robotic surgical skills. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(1). 116–128. 4 indexed citations

16.

Boal, Matthew, T. Morrison, Suzanne Higgs, et al.. (2023). Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(2). 554–585. 22 indexed citations

17.

Boal, Matthew, Evangelos B. Mazomenos, Nathan Curtis, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. British journal of surgery. 111(1). 33 indexed citations

18.

Griffith, David, Matthew Boal, & Timothy Rogers. (2017). Evolution of practice in the management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 53(4). 644–646. 18 indexed citations

19.

Boal, Matthew, et al.. (2016). Peritoneal encapsulation; a rare cause of bowel obstruction. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 99(1). e11–e12. 4 indexed citations

20.

Bradbury, Lisa, Matthew Boal, James P. Blackmur, et al.. (2015). Logistical Factors Influencing Cold Ischemia Times in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants. Transplantation. 100(2). 422–428. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact