Rachel O’Connell

2.6k citations
90 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 20

Rachel O’Connell

84 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Rachel O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Reproductive Medicine 216
  • Cancer Research 334
  • Oncology 428
  • Gastroenterology 86
  • Surgery 561
Replace Thomas J. Miner with:
Thomas J. Miner United States
Tor Åge Myklebust Norway
Michael J. Naslund United States
Rebecca Asher Australia
Tom Kurosaki United States
Kerry Rowe United States
Gideon Zamba United States
Klaus Kraywinkel Germany
Claire Taylor United Kingdom
Tom McNicholas United Kingdom
Rachel O’Connell relative to Thomas J. Miner United States Thomas J. Miner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Thomas J. Miner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel O’Connell. The network helps show where Rachel O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together Rachel O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20243
3 20229
4 20227
5 20217
6 202114
7 202124
8 20210
9 202110
10 201946
11 20192
12 201720
13 201730
14 201610
15 201516
16 20151
17
Development of the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment Concerns
20142
18 201424
19 20131
20 2007115

About Rachel O’Connell

Rachel O’Connell is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (27 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (26 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (16 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (216 citations), Cancer Research (334 citations), Oncology (428 citations), Gastroenterology (86 citations) and Surgery (561 citations). Rachel O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Rusby, Peter Barry, Rosa Di Micco, Komel Khabra, Martin R. Stockler, Michael Friedländer, Paul A. Harris, Anna M. Kirby, Katrin Marie Sjoquist and Roger Stevens. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026