Thomas Keeley

1.1k total citations
20 papers, 655 citations indexed

About

Thomas Keeley is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Keeley has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 655 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas Keeley's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers). Thomas Keeley is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers). Thomas Keeley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Thomas Keeley's co-authors include Melanie Calvert, Derek Kyte, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Joanna Coast, Hareth Al‐Janabi, Samantha Cruz Rivera, Paula Lorgelly, Heather Draper, Paul Mitchell and Anita Slade and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Keeley

20 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Keeley United Kingdom 14 266 194 181 96 75 20 655
Leila Rooshenas United Kingdom 16 195 0.7× 307 1.6× 280 1.5× 27 0.3× 86 1.1× 70 834
John Queenan Canada 13 124 0.5× 127 0.7× 106 0.6× 30 0.3× 96 1.3× 44 665
Julia Wade United Kingdom 16 134 0.5× 270 1.4× 311 1.7× 33 0.3× 213 2.8× 43 936
Emily Evans United States 14 96 0.4× 114 0.6× 88 0.5× 128 1.3× 84 1.1× 60 646
Thomas Piggott Canada 13 98 0.4× 109 0.6× 96 0.5× 53 0.6× 56 0.7× 46 515
Lih‐Wen Mau United States 14 111 0.4× 154 0.8× 180 1.0× 50 0.5× 93 1.2× 47 731
Jamie Roberts United States 11 188 0.7× 239 1.2× 252 1.4× 39 0.4× 39 0.5× 24 941
Isabel de Salis United Kingdom 13 160 0.6× 309 1.6× 416 2.3× 44 0.5× 50 0.7× 16 856
Yemi Oluboyede United Kingdom 13 163 0.6× 144 0.7× 55 0.3× 66 0.7× 45 0.6× 41 635
Gerald E. Thomson United States 11 127 0.5× 273 1.4× 115 0.6× 130 1.4× 29 0.4× 25 876

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Keeley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Keeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Keeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Keeley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Keeley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Keeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Keeley. The network helps show where Thomas Keeley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Keeley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Keeley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Keeley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Keeley. Thomas Keeley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McMullan, Christel, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Thomas Keeley, et al.. (2023). Paving the way for patient centricity in real-world evidence (RWE): Qualitative interviews to identify considerations for wider implementation of patient-reported outcomes in RWE generation. Heliyon. 9(9). e20157–e20157. 6 indexed citations
2.
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, et al.. (2022). Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 6(1). 57–57. 17 indexed citations
3.
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Victor Roth Cardoso, Georgios V. Gkoutos, et al.. (2022). Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in real-world evidence studies: Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov records (1999–2021). Contemporary Clinical Trials. 120. 106882–106882. 15 indexed citations
4.
Retzer, Ameeta, Melanie Calvert, Khaled Ahmed, et al.. (2021). International perspectives on suboptimal patient‐reported outcome trial design and reporting in cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study. Cancer Medicine. 10(16). 5475–5487. 12 indexed citations
5.
Retzer, Ameeta, Vanessa Pinfold, Thomas Keeley, et al.. (2020). Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0240518–e0240518. 13 indexed citations
6.
Kyte, Derek, Ameeta Retzer, Khaled Ahmed, et al.. (2019). Systematic Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Protocol Content and Reporting in Cancer Trials. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 111(11). 1170–1178. 67 indexed citations
7.
Retzer, Ameeta, Thomas Keeley, Khaled Ahmed, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of patient-reported outcome protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study qualitative protocol. BMJ Open. 8(2). e017282–e017282. 7 indexed citations
8.
Turner, Grace, Geetinder Kaur, Derek Kyte, et al.. (2018). Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 16(1). 133–133. 14 indexed citations
9.
Rivera, Samantha Cruz, Derek Kyte, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Thomas Keeley, & Melanie Calvert. (2017). Assessing the impact of healthcare research: A systematic review of methodological frameworks. PLoS Medicine. 14(8). e1002370–e1002370. 110 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Janet, Laura Jones, Thomas Keeley, Melanie Calvert, & Jonathan Mathers. (2017). A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets. PLoS ONE. 12(3). e0172937–e0172937. 38 indexed citations
11.
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Derek Kyte, Paul Cockwell, et al.. (2017). Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 12(6). e0179733–e0179733. 82 indexed citations
12.
Ahmed, Khaled, Derek Kyte, Thomas Keeley, et al.. (2016). Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol. BMJ Open. 6(9). e012863–e012863. 16 indexed citations
13.
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Derek Kyte, Paul Cockwell, et al.. (2016). Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 6(10). e012014–e012014. 9 indexed citations
15.
Mathers, Jonathan, Thomas Keeley, Laura Jones, et al.. (2015). Using qualitative research to understand what outcomes matter to patients: direct and indirect approaches to outcome elicitation. Trials. 16(S2). 8 indexed citations
16.
Keeley, Thomas, Hareth Al‐Janabi, Paula Lorgelly, & Joanna Coast. (2013). A Qualitative Assessment of the Content Validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and Their Appropriateness for Use in Health Research. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e85287–e85287. 75 indexed citations
17.
Al‐Janabi, Hareth, Thomas Keeley, Paul Mitchell, & Joanna Coast. (2013). Can capabilities be self-reported? A think aloud study. Social Science & Medicine. 87. 116–122. 59 indexed citations
18.
Kyte, Derek, Jonathan Ives, Heather Draper, Thomas Keeley, & Melanie Calvert. (2013). Inconsistencies in Quality of Life Data Collection in Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Bias? Interviews with Research Nurses and Trialists. PLoS ONE. 8(10). e76625–e76625. 40 indexed citations
19.
Kyte, Derek, Jonathan Ives, Heather Draper, Thomas Keeley, & Melanie Calvert. (2013). Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists. Trials. 14(S1). 3 indexed citations
20.
Calvert, Melanie, et al.. (2012). What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2(3). e000509–e000509. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026