Megan Hamm

77 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Megan Hamm
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Family Practice 15
  • Gender Studies 69
  • Clinical Psychology 143
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 31
Replace Hermioni L. Amonoo with:
Hermioni L. Amonoo United States
Jo Taylor United Kingdom
Francine Toyé United Kingdom
Barbara Hanna United States
Susan W. Hinze United States
Nicole Agaronnik United States
Lorraine Tulman United States
Hanne Konradsen Denmark
Carol Blixen United States
Andrzej Kozikowski United States
Megan Hamm relative to Hermioni L. Amonoo United States Hermioni L. Amonoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Hermioni L. Amonoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Hamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Hamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Hamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Hamm. The network helps show where Megan Hamm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan Hamm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan Hamm Line = papers co-authored together Megan Hamm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020101
2 201864
3 201857
4 202037
5 201631
6 201929
7 201727
8 201726
9 201424
10
The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients' perspectives.
201723
11 201822
12 201921
13 201920
14 201919
15 202117
16 202216
17 202215
18 201814
19 201814
20 201914

About Megan Hamm

Megan Hamm is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 93 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (15 citations), Gender Studies (69 citations), Clinical Psychology (143 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (31 citations). Megan Hamm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sonya Borrero, Rachel Hess, Holly N. Thomas, Rebecca C. Thurston, Susan Zickmund, Charles F. Reynolds, Jordan F. Karp, Jodi Krall, Emily Lenard and Helen Lavretsky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Contraception, JCO Oncology Practice and Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact