Natasha Bear
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Papers in
-
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders 27
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 13
- Co-authors
- Jane Valentine (12 shared papers)Anne Smith (4 shared papers)Noula Gibson (10 shared papers)Catherine Elliott (12 shared papers)A. M. Blackmore (6 shared papers)Peter O’Sullivan (3 shared papers)Leon Straker (4 shared papers)Eve Blair (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (7 papers)BMJ Open (5 papers)Disability and Rehabilitation (5 papers)BMC Pediatrics (4 papers)The Journal of Pediatrics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natasha Bear
75 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Psychiatry and Mental health 432
- Medical Laboratory Technology 23
- Rehabilitation 98
- Occupational Therapy 58
- Neurology 181
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Bear
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Bear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Bear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Bear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Bear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Bear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Bear. The network helps show where Natasha Bear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Bear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 20 |
About Natasha Bear
Natasha Bear is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Neurology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (27 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (14 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (13 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (11 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (8 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (7 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (5 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (432 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (23 citations), Rehabilitation (98 citations), Occupational Therapy (58 citations) and Neurology (181 citations). Natasha Bear has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jane Valentine, Anne Smith, Noula Gibson, Catherine Elliott, A. M. Blackmore, Peter O’Sullivan, Leon Straker, Eve Blair, Katherine Stannage and Cyril J. Donnelly. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, BMJ Open, Disability and Rehabilitation, BMC Pediatrics and The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.