Natalie James

549 citations
14 papers · 332 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie James

13 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Natalie James
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Neurology 180
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
  • Genetics 58
  • Emergency Medical Services 30
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 5
Replace José Miguel Hinojosa‐Amaya with:
José Miguel Hinojosa‐Amaya Mexico
Elizabeth N. Kuhn United States
Nitasha Dhiman United States
Haiyan Sun United States
Ravi Iyer United States
Caterina Agosto Italy
Ankoor A. Talwar United States
Jonathan Lévy France
Tien‐Ming Hng Australia
Lane Faughnan United States
Natalie James relative to José Miguel Hinojosa‐Amaya Mexico José Miguel Hinojosa‐Amaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
José Miguel Hinojosa‐Amaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie James. The network helps show where Natalie James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie James Line = papers co-authored together Natalie James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2017107
2 201394
3 201034
4
The Royal College of Radiologists' Clinical Oncology Information Network. British Association of Urological Surgeons. Guidelines on the management of prostate cancer.
199930
5 202015
6 202114
7 202310
8 20189
9 20198
10 20204
11 20204
12 20252
13 20191
14 20250

About Natalie James

Natalie James is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (180 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations), Genetics (58 citations), Emergency Medical Services (30 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (5 citations). Natalie James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anne Hogden, Geraldine Foley, Samar Aoun, Robert D. Henderson, Annette Dickinson, Heinz Jungbluth, Jackie Palace, David Hilton‐Jones, S. Robb and Catherine Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromuscular Disorders, BMJ Open, Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, Brain and Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact