Anne Hiller Scott
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Topics
- Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (7 papers)Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers)Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the Neurological SciencesDisability and RehabilitationAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Anne Hiller Scott
14 papers receiving 444 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 151
- Clinical Psychology 103
- Occupational Therapy 96
- Cognitive Neuroscience 93
- Psychiatry and Mental health 89
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Hiller Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Hiller Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Hiller Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Hiller Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Hiller Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Hiller Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Hiller Scott. The network helps show where Anne Hiller Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Hiller Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Hiller Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Hiller Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Hiller Scott. Anne Hiller Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | Review of luminaire maintenance factors | 1 |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | A national survey of admissions criteria and processes in selected allied health professions. | 30 |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 302 |
About Anne Hiller Scott
Anne Hiller Scott is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (7 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (96 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (151 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations). Anne Hiller Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Yasser Salem, Herb Karpatkin, Christopher V. Chambers, Jennie R. Joe, Deborah Mandel and Adam Sanders. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Disability and Rehabilitation and American Journal of Occupational Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.