Jane Koomar

1.2k total citations
17 papers, 725 citations indexed

About

Jane Koomar is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Koomar has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 725 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Jane Koomar's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). Jane Koomar is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). Jane Koomar collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Iraq. Jane Koomar's co-authors include Teresa A. May-Benson, Ellen S. Cohn, Zoe Mailloux, Roseann C. Schaaf, L. Diane Parham, Susanne Smith Roley, Barbara Brett‐Green, Lucy Miller, Janice Posatery Burke and Sarah Schoen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Occupational Therapy and Journal of Family Violence.

In The Last Decade

Jane Koomar

17 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Koomar United States 12 332 279 272 265 123 17 725
Shelley Mulligan United States 14 279 0.8× 218 0.8× 232 0.9× 114 0.4× 97 0.8× 34 569
Heather Miller-Kuhaneck United States 16 304 0.9× 198 0.7× 314 1.2× 357 1.3× 171 1.4× 44 738
Stephanie Hart United States 12 103 0.3× 200 0.7× 294 1.1× 184 0.7× 62 0.5× 26 632
Amir Hossein Memari Iran 13 269 0.8× 173 0.6× 358 1.3× 144 0.5× 22 0.2× 20 619
Lindy Weaver United States 8 184 0.6× 139 0.5× 249 0.9× 201 0.8× 71 0.6× 18 481
Gunnel Janeslätt Sweden 15 150 0.5× 108 0.4× 86 0.3× 194 0.7× 93 0.8× 48 436
Edward A. Workman United States 12 169 0.5× 313 1.1× 249 0.9× 196 0.7× 27 0.2× 26 656
Theresa Malloy‐Miller Canada 13 382 1.2× 521 1.9× 69 0.3× 192 0.7× 154 1.3× 17 792
David Young United States 12 90 0.3× 165 0.6× 424 1.6× 125 0.5× 51 0.4× 21 733
Dennis C. Russo United States 13 232 0.7× 503 1.8× 431 1.6× 278 1.0× 14 0.1× 31 876

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Koomar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Koomar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Koomar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Koomar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Koomar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Koomar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Koomar. The network helps show where Jane Koomar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Koomar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Koomar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Koomar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Koomar. Jane Koomar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
May-Benson, Teresa A., et al.. (2021). Inter-Rater Reliability of Goal Attainment Scaling with Children with Sensory Processing Disorder. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 1–13. 10 indexed citations
2.
May-Benson, Teresa A., Susanne Smith Roley, Zoe Mailloux, et al.. (2014). Interrater Reliability and Discriminative Validity of the Structural Elements of the Ayres Sensory Integration® Fidelity Measure©. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 68(5). 506–513. 28 indexed citations
3.
Warner, Elizabeth, et al.. (2013). Can the Body Change the Score? Application of Sensory Modulation Principles in the Treatment of Traumatized Adolescents in Residential Settings. Journal of Family Violence. 28(7). 729–738. 48 indexed citations
4.
Cohn, Ellen S., et al.. (2012). Mothering when Mothers and Children Both have Sensory Processing Challenges. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 75(10). 449–455. 13 indexed citations
5.
Koomar, Jane, et al.. (2011). Effects of Sensory-Enhanced Yoga on Symptoms of Combat Stress in Deployed Military Personnel. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 66(1). 59–68. 73 indexed citations
6.
Parham, L. Diane, Susanne Smith Roley, Teresa A. May-Benson, et al.. (2011). Development of a Fidelity Measure for Research on the Effectiveness of the Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 65(2). 133–142. 126 indexed citations
7.
May-Benson, Teresa A. & Jane Koomar. (2010). Systematic Review of the Research Evidence Examining the Effectiveness of Interventions Using a Sensory Integrative Approach for Children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 64(3). 403–414. 123 indexed citations
8.
Mailloux, Zoe, Teresa A. May-Benson, Lucy Miller, et al.. (2007). Goal Attainment Scaling as a Measure of Meaningful Outcomes for Children With Sensory Integration Disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 61(2). 254–259. 76 indexed citations
9.
Parham, L. Diane, Ellen S. Cohn, Susan L. Spitzer, et al.. (2007). Fidelity in Sensory Integration Intervention Research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 61(2). 216–227. 148 indexed citations
10.
May-Benson, Teresa A. & Jane Koomar. (2007). Identifying Gravitational Insecurity in Children: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 61(2). 142–147. 14 indexed citations
11.
Koomar, Jane, et al.. (2001). Theoretical and Clinical Perspectives on the Interactive Metronome®: A View From Occupational Therapy Practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 55(2). 163–166. 22 indexed citations
12.
Koomar, Jane. (2001). Answers to Questions Teachers Ask about Sensory Integration: Forms, Checklists, and Practical Tools for Teachers and Parents. 1 indexed citations
13.
Royeen, Charlotte Brasic, et al.. (1991). Evidence for Content and Discriminant Validity of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Test Competency Exam. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 11(6). 357–366. 1 indexed citations
14.
Cermak, Sharon A., et al.. (1990). Praxis on Verbal Command and Imitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 44(7). 641–645. 7 indexed citations
15.
Magalhães, Lívia de Castro, Jane Koomar, & Sharon A. Cermak. (1989). Bilateral Motor Coordination in 5- to 9-Year-Old Children: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 43(7). 437–443. 15 indexed citations
16.
Cermak, Sharon A., et al.. (1988). Praxis and Gesture Comprehension in 4-, 5-, and 6-Year-Olds. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 42(2). 99–104. 11 indexed citations
17.
Koomar, Jane & Sharon A. Cermak. (1981). Reliability of Dichotic Listening Using Two Stimulus Formats with Normal and Learning-Disabled Children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 35(7). 456–463. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026